Building Form Modelling in Architectural Design Education

R. Oxman
{"title":"Building Form Modelling in Architectural Design Education","authors":"R. Oxman","doi":"10.52842/conf.ecaade.1991.x.k4c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes an approach to architectural design education within the tradition of grammatical studies. It exploits certain attributes of computer modelling and computer graphics programs as an environment to convey architectural knowledge. The formal representation of designs and the manipulation of these representations are proposed as architectural knowledge and one of the foundations of design. Computer-based three-dimensional formal analysis of designs is employed as a technique for the acquisition of knowledge of classes of designs. Through formal analysis certain general models of building form are postulated. The classes of building form models in architecture are elaborated, and their relation to the concept of architectural syntax is discussed. The computational significance of building form modelling is considered, and the relevance of formal modelling in design education is discussed. Architectural Knowledge as a Foundation of Design and Design Education At the workshop meeting of ECAADE '87 in Zurich (Kramel, 1987) a significant topic of discussion was the emerging role of the computer in design education within the architectural curriculum. At this meeting, as well as at subsequent meetings of ECAADE and ACADIA, it had become apparent that a new role was emerging for the computer in architectural schools as an environment for the study of design. What was crystalizing in the late Eighties was the intensive development of computer-based architectural formal studies related to the teaching of design per se. From its research-oriented origins in universities such as UCLA and Carnegie Mellon, the use of the computer as a vehicle for the teaching of architectural design principles has now become well-established as a significant part of the curriculum in many architectural schools (McCullough, Mitchell, Purcell, 1990). Most of this work has retained its design research orientation. It is generally based upon grammars and formal languages, and deals with studies in areas such as composition and transformational operations (Schmitt, 1988; Radford and Stevens, 1987). Recently the work has been collectively referred to as 'grammatical approaches in design education' (Woodbury,1991). Because of the analytical and rigorous orientation to design research which is characteristic of the approach, the dual functions of design education, and the generation of knowledge through design research are both satisfied. Certain of the teacher/researchers in the field have recently begun to change emphasis from ad hoc studies of specific works to the formalization of general formal knowledge in design (Flemming, 1990; Madrazo, 1990; Oxman and Oxman, 1991). In this paper we present an approach to the formalization of general models of building form in architecture. The formulation of the knowledge of building form models is the result of student research within a course which employed computer-based three-dimensional formal analysis in the study of architectural form. The explicit goal was to analyze a range of classes of building form according to instances of these classes in the work of specific architects. Through the analysis of a range of specific instances, we have attempted to define the design principles of the class. The concept of models of architectural representations is itself a research subject of significance in CAAD (Eastman, 1990). In the current research we present a preliminary proposal for classes of general building form models. The particular emphasis has been to establish models which may be useful in design computation.","PeriodicalId":366031,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.1991.x.k4c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper describes an approach to architectural design education within the tradition of grammatical studies. It exploits certain attributes of computer modelling and computer graphics programs as an environment to convey architectural knowledge. The formal representation of designs and the manipulation of these representations are proposed as architectural knowledge and one of the foundations of design. Computer-based three-dimensional formal analysis of designs is employed as a technique for the acquisition of knowledge of classes of designs. Through formal analysis certain general models of building form are postulated. The classes of building form models in architecture are elaborated, and their relation to the concept of architectural syntax is discussed. The computational significance of building form modelling is considered, and the relevance of formal modelling in design education is discussed. Architectural Knowledge as a Foundation of Design and Design Education At the workshop meeting of ECAADE '87 in Zurich (Kramel, 1987) a significant topic of discussion was the emerging role of the computer in design education within the architectural curriculum. At this meeting, as well as at subsequent meetings of ECAADE and ACADIA, it had become apparent that a new role was emerging for the computer in architectural schools as an environment for the study of design. What was crystalizing in the late Eighties was the intensive development of computer-based architectural formal studies related to the teaching of design per se. From its research-oriented origins in universities such as UCLA and Carnegie Mellon, the use of the computer as a vehicle for the teaching of architectural design principles has now become well-established as a significant part of the curriculum in many architectural schools (McCullough, Mitchell, Purcell, 1990). Most of this work has retained its design research orientation. It is generally based upon grammars and formal languages, and deals with studies in areas such as composition and transformational operations (Schmitt, 1988; Radford and Stevens, 1987). Recently the work has been collectively referred to as 'grammatical approaches in design education' (Woodbury,1991). Because of the analytical and rigorous orientation to design research which is characteristic of the approach, the dual functions of design education, and the generation of knowledge through design research are both satisfied. Certain of the teacher/researchers in the field have recently begun to change emphasis from ad hoc studies of specific works to the formalization of general formal knowledge in design (Flemming, 1990; Madrazo, 1990; Oxman and Oxman, 1991). In this paper we present an approach to the formalization of general models of building form in architecture. The formulation of the knowledge of building form models is the result of student research within a course which employed computer-based three-dimensional formal analysis in the study of architectural form. The explicit goal was to analyze a range of classes of building form according to instances of these classes in the work of specific architects. Through the analysis of a range of specific instances, we have attempted to define the design principles of the class. The concept of models of architectural representations is itself a research subject of significance in CAAD (Eastman, 1990). In the current research we present a preliminary proposal for classes of general building form models. The particular emphasis has been to establish models which may be useful in design computation.
建筑设计教育中的建筑形式建模
本文描述了一种在语法研究传统中进行建筑设计教育的方法。它利用计算机建模和计算机图形程序的某些属性作为传递建筑知识的环境。设计的形式表示和这些表示的操作被认为是建筑知识和设计的基础之一。基于计算机的设计的三维形式化分析被用作一种获取设计类知识的技术。通过形式化分析,假定了建筑形式的某些一般模型。阐述了建筑中建筑形式模型的分类,并讨论了它们与建筑语法概念的关系。考虑了建筑形式建模的计算意义,并讨论了形式建模在设计教育中的相关性。作为设计和设计教育基础的建筑知识在苏黎世举行的ECAADE '87研讨会上(Kramel, 1987)讨论的一个重要话题是计算机在建筑课程设计教育中的新兴角色。在这次会议上,以及在ECAADE和ACADIA随后的会议上,很明显,计算机作为研究设计的环境,在建筑学校中扮演了一个新的角色。在80年代后期,与设计本身的教学相关的基于计算机的建筑形式研究得到了广泛的发展。从加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校和卡内基梅隆大学等大学的研究型起源开始,使用计算机作为建筑设计原理教学的工具,现在已经成为许多建筑学校课程的重要组成部分(McCullough, Mitchell, Purcell, 1990)。大部分工作都保留了设计研究的方向。它通常以语法和形式语言为基础,并涉及诸如组合和转换操作等领域的研究(Schmitt, 1988;Radford and Stevens, 1987)。最近,这项工作被统称为“设计教育中的语法方法”(Woodbury,1991)。由于该方法的特点是对设计研究的分析性和严谨性,从而满足了设计教育和通过设计研究产生知识的双重功能。该领域的某些教师/研究人员最近开始将重点从对具体作品的特别研究转向对设计中一般正式知识的形式化(Flemming, 1990;Madrazo, 1990;奥克斯曼和奥克斯曼,1991)。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来形式化一般模型的建筑形式。建筑形式模型知识的形成是学生在建筑形式研究中使用基于计算机的三维形式分析的课程研究的结果。明确的目标是根据特定建筑师作品中这些类别的实例来分析一系列的建筑形式。通过对一系列具体实例的分析,我们试图定义类的设计原则。建筑表征模型的概念本身就是CAAD中一个有意义的研究课题(Eastman, 1990)。在目前的研究中,我们提出了一般建筑形式模型分类的初步建议。特别强调的是建立可能对设计计算有用的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信