Comparison of patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency between conventional and 3D printed complete dentures

{"title":"Comparison of patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency between conventional and 3D printed complete dentures","authors":"","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2021.200346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare 3D printed complete dentures fabricated of dimethacrylate-based resins with Photo – initiator with conventional complete dentures regarding patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency. Materials and methods: Six completely edentulous patients were selected for this study from the prosthetic department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. For each patient 2 complete dentures were fabricated. The first dentures were conventionally fabricated while the other complete dentures were digitally fabricated through 3D printing of dimethacrylate-based resins with photo-initiator, identical to the scanned previously fabricated conventional dentures. Patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency for both dentures for each patient were evaluated using patient satisfaction questionnaire and two-colored chewing gum technique respectively at (T0) the time of complete denture insertion, (T3) after 3 months of denture use and (T6) after 6 months of denture use. Results: The results of the current study revealed insignificant difference of patient’s satisfaction between conventionally fabricated complete dentures and 3d printed complete dentures for all domains and the overall at T0, T3, and T6. (P> 0.05). Comparison of the OHIPEDENT scores for pre-treatment and T6 revealed significant improvement in all domains. For both dentures. Regarding chewing efficiency, the comparison between conventional and 3D-printed dentures revealed no significant differences for all chewing cycles. Conclusions: 3D printed complete dentures fabricated of dimethacrylate-based resins could be considered as satisfactory alternative to conventionally fabricated complete dentures regarding patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.200346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare 3D printed complete dentures fabricated of dimethacrylate-based resins with Photo – initiator with conventional complete dentures regarding patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency. Materials and methods: Six completely edentulous patients were selected for this study from the prosthetic department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. For each patient 2 complete dentures were fabricated. The first dentures were conventionally fabricated while the other complete dentures were digitally fabricated through 3D printing of dimethacrylate-based resins with photo-initiator, identical to the scanned previously fabricated conventional dentures. Patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency for both dentures for each patient were evaluated using patient satisfaction questionnaire and two-colored chewing gum technique respectively at (T0) the time of complete denture insertion, (T3) after 3 months of denture use and (T6) after 6 months of denture use. Results: The results of the current study revealed insignificant difference of patient’s satisfaction between conventionally fabricated complete dentures and 3d printed complete dentures for all domains and the overall at T0, T3, and T6. (P> 0.05). Comparison of the OHIPEDENT scores for pre-treatment and T6 revealed significant improvement in all domains. For both dentures. Regarding chewing efficiency, the comparison between conventional and 3D-printed dentures revealed no significant differences for all chewing cycles. Conclusions: 3D printed complete dentures fabricated of dimethacrylate-based resins could be considered as satisfactory alternative to conventionally fabricated complete dentures regarding patient satisfaction and chewing efficiency.
常规与3D打印全口义齿患者满意度及咀嚼效率的比较
目的:对光引发剂二甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂3D打印全口义齿与传统全口义齿在患者满意度和咀嚼效率方面进行临床评价和比较。材料与方法:选取曼苏拉大学牙科学院义肢部6例全无牙患者进行研究。每个患者制作2个全口义齿。第一个假牙是传统制作的,而其他全假牙是通过二甲丙烯酸酯基树脂与光引发剂的3D打印数字制作的,与之前扫描的传统假牙相同。采用患者满意度问卷和双色口香糖技术分别在(T0)置入全口义齿时、(T3)使用义齿3个月后和(T6)使用全口义齿6个月后对患者满意度和双口义齿咀嚼效率进行评价。结果:本研究结果显示,在T0、T3、T6时,常规制作全口义齿与3d打印全口义齿在各领域和总体上的满意度差异均不显著。(P > 0.05)。比较治疗前和T6的OHIPEDENT评分,发现所有领域都有显著改善。对于两个假牙。在咀嚼效率方面,传统义齿和3d打印义齿在所有咀嚼周期的比较中没有显著差异。结论:基于二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂的3D打印全口义齿在患者满意度和咀嚼效率方面可以被认为是传统制作全口义齿的令人满意的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信