The Big-4 Premium in the German Audit Market for Listed and Private Firms

Philipp Joha, Johannes Günther
{"title":"The Big-4 Premium in the German Audit Market for Listed and Private Firms","authors":"Philipp Joha, Johannes Günther","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2540109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The majority of audit fee research has identified that BIG-N audit firms charge higher fees than other auditors. To detect the reasons for such a fee premium in a concentrated audit market it is necessary to compare audit pricing in the concentrated market to pricing behavior in a competitive market. We follow this approach proposed by SIMUNIC (1980) but unlike most researchers we separate the German audit market in a segment for listed and non-listed auditees. This allows us to capture the difference in the amplitude of an audit mandate in a more universal way as well as to separate the audit market in a competitive and a concentrated segment more accurately. Thereby, to our knowledge we are also the first to examine audit fees of non-listed companies in Germany. We observe a fee premium for BIG-4 auditors in both market segments when applying an aggregated BIG-4 variable as well as looking at these audit firms separately. This suggests product differentiation as the root for higher prices and competitive audit pricing refuting regulators' concerns of monopolistic pricing behavior due to a high market concentration. This is supported by a Fee Cutting effect. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that similar to listed firms audit pricing for private firms is influenced by client's size, complexity and risk factors.","PeriodicalId":202880,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2540109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The majority of audit fee research has identified that BIG-N audit firms charge higher fees than other auditors. To detect the reasons for such a fee premium in a concentrated audit market it is necessary to compare audit pricing in the concentrated market to pricing behavior in a competitive market. We follow this approach proposed by SIMUNIC (1980) but unlike most researchers we separate the German audit market in a segment for listed and non-listed auditees. This allows us to capture the difference in the amplitude of an audit mandate in a more universal way as well as to separate the audit market in a competitive and a concentrated segment more accurately. Thereby, to our knowledge we are also the first to examine audit fees of non-listed companies in Germany. We observe a fee premium for BIG-4 auditors in both market segments when applying an aggregated BIG-4 variable as well as looking at these audit firms separately. This suggests product differentiation as the root for higher prices and competitive audit pricing refuting regulators' concerns of monopolistic pricing behavior due to a high market concentration. This is supported by a Fee Cutting effect. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that similar to listed firms audit pricing for private firms is influenced by client's size, complexity and risk factors.
德国上市公司和私营公司审计市场的“四大”溢价
大多数审计费用研究表明,BIG-N审计公司收取的费用高于其他审计公司。为了找出集中审计市场中这种费用溢价的原因,有必要将集中市场中的审计定价与竞争市场中的定价行为进行比较。我们遵循SIMUNIC(1980)提出的方法,但与大多数研究人员不同,我们将德国审计市场分为上市和非上市审计机构。这使我们能够以更普遍的方式捕捉审计任务幅度的差异,并更准确地将审计市场划分为竞争和集中的部分。因此,据我们所知,我们也是第一个研究德国非上市公司审计费用的机构。我们观察到,当应用汇总的BIG-4变量以及单独考察这些审计公司时,这两个细分市场的BIG-4审计师的费用溢价。这表明产品差异化是高价格和竞争性审计定价的根源,驳斥了监管机构对市场集中度高导致的垄断定价行为的担忧。这得到了费用削减效应的支持。此外,我们的研究结果表明,与上市公司类似,私营公司的审计定价受到客户规模、复杂性和风险因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信