Hämoptysen: Wann ist die Bronchoskopie besonders wertvoll?

M. Wagner
{"title":"Hämoptysen: Wann ist die Bronchoskopie besonders wertvoll?","authors":"M. Wagner","doi":"10.1159/000499953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bronchoscopy plays a key role to diagnose the etiology, to localize the site, and to identify the sources of the bleeding in patients with hemoptysis, but the ideal timing of an endoscopic examination is still unclear. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of an observational and multicenter study, aimed at evaluating the epidemiology of hemoptysis in Italy and the diagnostic yield of the most frequently prescribed examinations. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an early bronchoscopy (i.e., performed during active bleeding/≤48 h after hemoptysis stopped) helps localize bleeding (i.e., site, lobe, lung) and increase diagnostic yield in comparison with a delayed examination. Results: Four hundred eighty-six consecutive adult patients (69.2% males; median [IQR] age: 67 [53-76] years) with hemoptysis requiring an etiological diagnosis and undergoing bronchoscopy were recruited. Bleeding focus could be located more frequently in case of moderate-severe bleedings than in cases of mild hemoptysis (site: 70/154, 45.4%, VS. 73/330, 22.1%; p-value < 0.0001; lobe: 95/155, 61.3%, VS. 95/331, 28.7%; p-value < 0.0001; lung: 101/155, 65.1%, VS. 111/331, 33.5%; p-value < 0.0001). Early bronchoscopy showed a higher detection rate of bleeding source in comparison with delayed examination (site: 76/214, 35.5%, VS. 67/272, 24.6%; p-value = 0.01; lobe: 98/214, 45.8%, VS. 92/272, 33.8%; p-value = 0.007; lung: 110/214, 51.4%, VS. 102/272, 37.5%; p-value = 0.002). Early bronchoscopy did not provide any advantages in terms of increased diagnostic yield, in the total cohort (113/214, 52.8%, VS. 123/272, 45.2%; p-value = 0.10) and in the severity subtypes (mild: 56/128, 43.8%, VS. 88/203, 43.4%; p-value = 0.94; moderate-severe: 57/86, 66.2%, VS. 35/69, 50.7%; p-value = 0.051). Conclusions: Early bronchoscopy helps detect bleeding sources, particularly in cases of moderate-severe hemoptysis, without increasing diagnostic accuracy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02045394).","PeriodicalId":306175,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000499953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bronchoscopy plays a key role to diagnose the etiology, to localize the site, and to identify the sources of the bleeding in patients with hemoptysis, but the ideal timing of an endoscopic examination is still unclear. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of an observational and multicenter study, aimed at evaluating the epidemiology of hemoptysis in Italy and the diagnostic yield of the most frequently prescribed examinations. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an early bronchoscopy (i.e., performed during active bleeding/≤48 h after hemoptysis stopped) helps localize bleeding (i.e., site, lobe, lung) and increase diagnostic yield in comparison with a delayed examination. Results: Four hundred eighty-six consecutive adult patients (69.2% males; median [IQR] age: 67 [53-76] years) with hemoptysis requiring an etiological diagnosis and undergoing bronchoscopy were recruited. Bleeding focus could be located more frequently in case of moderate-severe bleedings than in cases of mild hemoptysis (site: 70/154, 45.4%, VS. 73/330, 22.1%; p-value < 0.0001; lobe: 95/155, 61.3%, VS. 95/331, 28.7%; p-value < 0.0001; lung: 101/155, 65.1%, VS. 111/331, 33.5%; p-value < 0.0001). Early bronchoscopy showed a higher detection rate of bleeding source in comparison with delayed examination (site: 76/214, 35.5%, VS. 67/272, 24.6%; p-value = 0.01; lobe: 98/214, 45.8%, VS. 92/272, 33.8%; p-value = 0.007; lung: 110/214, 51.4%, VS. 102/272, 37.5%; p-value = 0.002). Early bronchoscopy did not provide any advantages in terms of increased diagnostic yield, in the total cohort (113/214, 52.8%, VS. 123/272, 45.2%; p-value = 0.10) and in the severity subtypes (mild: 56/128, 43.8%, VS. 88/203, 43.4%; p-value = 0.94; moderate-severe: 57/86, 66.2%, VS. 35/69, 50.7%; p-value = 0.051). Conclusions: Early bronchoscopy helps detect bleeding sources, particularly in cases of moderate-severe hemoptysis, without increasing diagnostic accuracy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02045394).
病毒感染者:支气管窥镜什么时候特别重要?
背景:在咯血患者中,支气管镜检查在诊断病因、定位部位和确定出血来源方面起着关键作用,但内镜检查的理想时机尚不清楚。方法:我们对一项观察性多中心研究进行了二次分析,旨在评估意大利咯血的流行病学和最常用的处方检查的诊断率。本研究的目的是评估早期支气管镜检查(即在活动性出血期间/咯血停止后≤48小时)是否有助于定位出血(即部位、肺叶、肺),并与延迟检查相比提高诊断率。结果:连续486例成人患者(男性69.2%;中位[IQR]年龄:67[53-76]岁),需要病因诊断并接受支气管镜检查的咯血患者。中重度出血患者比轻度咯血患者更容易定位出血病灶(部位:70/154,45.4%,73/330,22.1%;p值< 0.0001;叶瓣:95/155,61.3%,VS. 95/331, 28.7%;p值< 0.0001;肺:101/155,65.1% VS. 111/331, 33.5%;p值< 0.0001)。早期支气管镜检查出血源检出率高于延迟检查(部位:76/214,35.5%;67/272,24.6%;p值= 0.01;叶瓣:98/214,45.8%,VS. 92/272, 33.8%;p值= 0.007;肺:110/214,51.4% VS. 102/272, 37.5%;p值= 0.002)。在整个队列中,早期支气管镜检查在提高诊断率方面没有任何优势(113/214,52.8%,对123/272,45.2%;p值= 0.10)和严重亚型(轻度:56/128,43.8%,对88/203,43.4%;p值= 0.94;中重度:57/86,66.2%,VS. 35/69, 50.7%;p值= 0.051)。结论:早期支气管镜检查有助于发现出血来源,特别是在中重度咯血病例中,但没有提高诊断准确性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT02045394)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信