Forgone Investment: Civil Conflict and Agricultural Credit in Colombia

N. de Roux, L. Mart́ınez
{"title":"Forgone Investment: Civil Conflict and Agricultural Credit in Colombia","authors":"N. de Roux, L. Mart́ınez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3725231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do agricultural producers forgo otherwise profitable investments due to civil conflict?Answering this question is crucial to our understanding of the costs of violence, but requires the ability to measure farmers’ willingness to invest and access to exogenous variation in conflict intensity. We exploit a unique administrative dataset from Colombia’s largest agricultural bank and the 2016 demobilization agreement between the Colombian government and insurgent group FARC to overcome these challenges. A difference-in-difference analysis yields three main findings: First, credit to small producers increases after the agreement in municipalities with high FARC exposure (17%over sample mean). Higher loan applications drive this increase, with no change in supply-side variables. Second, a simple theoretical framework combined with rich information on characteristics of loan applicants and projects (including credit scores and loan outcomes) suggests that changes in project returns, but not in risk, underlie the increase in credit demand. Third, conflict is not the binding constraint on investment in areas with low access to markets. Higher investment, unchanged default rates and additional evidence of increased nighttime luminosity after the end of conflict imply an overall positive economic impact.","PeriodicalId":191636,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Development Economics: Microeconomic Issues in Developing Economies (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Development Economics: Microeconomic Issues in Developing Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Do agricultural producers forgo otherwise profitable investments due to civil conflict?Answering this question is crucial to our understanding of the costs of violence, but requires the ability to measure farmers’ willingness to invest and access to exogenous variation in conflict intensity. We exploit a unique administrative dataset from Colombia’s largest agricultural bank and the 2016 demobilization agreement between the Colombian government and insurgent group FARC to overcome these challenges. A difference-in-difference analysis yields three main findings: First, credit to small producers increases after the agreement in municipalities with high FARC exposure (17%over sample mean). Higher loan applications drive this increase, with no change in supply-side variables. Second, a simple theoretical framework combined with rich information on characteristics of loan applicants and projects (including credit scores and loan outcomes) suggests that changes in project returns, but not in risk, underlie the increase in credit demand. Third, conflict is not the binding constraint on investment in areas with low access to markets. Higher investment, unchanged default rates and additional evidence of increased nighttime luminosity after the end of conflict imply an overall positive economic impact.
放弃投资:哥伦比亚的国内冲突和农业信贷
农业生产者是否会因为国内冲突而放弃原本有利可图的投资?回答这个问题对于我们理解暴力的代价至关重要,但需要有能力衡量农民的投资意愿,并获得冲突强度的外生变化。我们利用哥伦比亚最大的农业银行的独特行政数据集和哥伦比亚政府与叛乱组织哥伦比亚革命武装力量之间的2016年复员协议来克服这些挑战。差异分析产生了三个主要发现:首先,在哥伦比亚革命武装力量暴露程度高的城市,对小生产者的信贷在协议后增加(比样本平均值高出17%)。更高的贷款申请推动了这一增长,而供给侧变量没有变化。其次,一个简单的理论框架结合了关于贷款申请人和项目特征(包括信用评分和贷款结果)的丰富信息,表明项目回报的变化,而不是风险的变化,是信贷需求增加的基础。第三,在市场准入较低的地区,冲突不是对投资的约束性约束。更高的投资、不变的违约率以及冲突结束后夜间亮度增加的额外证据意味着总体上积极的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信