Closing the gaps: toward unifying and deepening the study of creativity

Scott D. Dexter, Aaron Kozbelt
{"title":"Closing the gaps: toward unifying and deepening the study of creativity","authors":"Scott D. Dexter, Aaron Kozbelt","doi":"10.1145/2466627.2466674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose that the study of creativity would benefit from more efforts to unify methods and results from disparate modes of inquiry and domains. We illustrate one approach for combining two perspectives: Martindale's regressive imagery and computer-based text analysis; and Ericsson and Simon's articulation of concurrent verbal protocol analysis for studying creative problem solving. We examine two domains: visual arts and computer programming. Our approach yields data suggestive of potentially key differences across domains, thereby suggesting that such hybrid techniques may inform creative problem solving in basic and unprecedented ways.","PeriodicalId":333903,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2466674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose that the study of creativity would benefit from more efforts to unify methods and results from disparate modes of inquiry and domains. We illustrate one approach for combining two perspectives: Martindale's regressive imagery and computer-based text analysis; and Ericsson and Simon's articulation of concurrent verbal protocol analysis for studying creative problem solving. We examine two domains: visual arts and computer programming. Our approach yields data suggestive of potentially key differences across domains, thereby suggesting that such hybrid techniques may inform creative problem solving in basic and unprecedented ways.
缩小差距:走向统一和深化创造力研究
我们建议,对创造力的研究将受益于更多的努力,统一的方法和结果,从不同的调查模式和领域。我们举例说明了一种结合两种观点的方法:Martindale的回归图像和基于计算机的文本分析;Ericsson和Simon对研究创造性问题解决的并发语言协议分析的阐述。我们研究两个领域:视觉艺术和计算机编程。我们的方法产生的数据暗示了跨领域的潜在关键差异,从而表明这种混合技术可能以基本和前所未有的方式为创造性问题解决提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信