Impact of Course Delivery Mode on Learner Engagement in MOOCs

Monika Avello, Mary Ellen Wiltrout, Ana Bell, Christin Vonder Haar, S. Fruchtman
{"title":"Impact of Course Delivery Mode on Learner Engagement in MOOCs","authors":"Monika Avello, Mary Ellen Wiltrout, Ana Bell, Christin Vonder Haar, S. Fruchtman","doi":"10.1109/LWMOOCS50143.2020.9234325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) generally have two modes of course delivery: the instructor-paced mode with multiple fixed deadlines to complete assessments or the self-paced mode with a final deadline when the course closes. Many MOOC platform providers have shifted from delivering courses in instructor-paced mode to self-paced mode, assuming that a longer, flexible schedule allows learners to better engage with and complete courses. Although this question of self-paced versus instructor-paced is not new, the answer is still relevant given that studies comparing the two course delivery modes of MOOCs provided mixed results and the pressure to run all MOOCs as self-paced. In this study, we took a deeper look into learner engagement differences between the two course delivery modes for one quantitative biology course and one computer programming course. Despite the differences in enrollment numbers and content, we found similar trends between both courses involving benefits to instructor-paced over self-paced delivery, especially when evaluating more engaged behaviors like posting to the discussion forum or submitting a problem answer. Interestingly, most completers finished the courses across 80-90% of the available days in an instructor-paced run. For self-paced runs, the median range of time a completer was active was less than one fifth of the time the course was open, but some completers did take advantage of finishing the course in a smaller or maximum window of time. We also found that most completers were active a similar total number of days in self-paced and instructor-paced course runs, despite having more days available in the self-paced runs and that the activity per day per completer was lower in self-paced delivery mode for both courses.","PeriodicalId":374390,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS50143.2020.9234325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) generally have two modes of course delivery: the instructor-paced mode with multiple fixed deadlines to complete assessments or the self-paced mode with a final deadline when the course closes. Many MOOC platform providers have shifted from delivering courses in instructor-paced mode to self-paced mode, assuming that a longer, flexible schedule allows learners to better engage with and complete courses. Although this question of self-paced versus instructor-paced is not new, the answer is still relevant given that studies comparing the two course delivery modes of MOOCs provided mixed results and the pressure to run all MOOCs as self-paced. In this study, we took a deeper look into learner engagement differences between the two course delivery modes for one quantitative biology course and one computer programming course. Despite the differences in enrollment numbers and content, we found similar trends between both courses involving benefits to instructor-paced over self-paced delivery, especially when evaluating more engaged behaviors like posting to the discussion forum or submitting a problem answer. Interestingly, most completers finished the courses across 80-90% of the available days in an instructor-paced run. For self-paced runs, the median range of time a completer was active was less than one fifth of the time the course was open, but some completers did take advantage of finishing the course in a smaller or maximum window of time. We also found that most completers were active a similar total number of days in self-paced and instructor-paced course runs, despite having more days available in the self-paced runs and that the activity per day per completer was lower in self-paced delivery mode for both courses.
mooc课程交付模式对学习者参与的影响
大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)通常有两种课程交付模式:一种是有多个固定截止日期完成评估的教师进度模式,另一种是有课程结束的最终截止日期的自进度模式。许多MOOC平台提供商已经从讲师授课模式转向自定授课模式,他们认为更长、更灵活的时间表可以让学习者更好地参与和完成课程。尽管自定进度与教师进度的问题并不新鲜,但考虑到比较mooc两种课程交付模式的研究得出了不同的结果,以及所有mooc都采用自定进度的压力,答案仍然是相关的。在这项研究中,我们深入研究了一门定量生物学课程和一门计算机编程课程的两种课程交付模式之间学习者参与度的差异。尽管注册人数和内容有所不同,但我们发现两门课程的趋势相似,这两门课程都涉及到教师节奏比自定节奏授课的好处,尤其是在评估更参与性的行为时,比如在论坛上发帖或提交问题答案。有趣的是,大多数学员在80-90%的时间内完成了由教练指导的课程。对于自定节奏的跑步,完成者活跃时间的中位数范围不到课程开放时间的五分之一,但一些完成者确实利用了在更短或最大的时间窗口内完成课程。我们还发现,尽管在自定节奏的课程中有更多的可用天数,但大多数完成者在自定节奏的课程和教师节奏的课程中活跃的总天数相似,并且在自定节奏的课程中,每个完成者每天的活动量都较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信