Schengen Acquis Over Time

Dana Zordova
{"title":"Schengen Acquis Over Time","authors":"Dana Zordova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2864913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the very onset of the European Union, the founding fathers and policy-makers have tasked themselves with the goal of free movement within the single market and ideally within united and borderless Europe. The two seemingly separate and independent developments allowed for the realization of these early aspirations for unhindered circulation within the territory of the larger EU; the gradual and step-by-step abolition of barriers to trade and movement in the name of economic integration as orchestrated by the Community on one hand, and the intergovernmental agreement binding a handful of states outside of the EU legal framework on the other. Intimately intertwined with the Single European Market, the latter-although originating from without of the European Community legislation- has significantly contributed to shifting from purely economic freedoms of workers to encompass also further non-economic rights of the remaining public. The incorporation into the EU legal framework and its current status can only hardly be explained without taking into account Schengen in tandem with the SEA. \n \nThe aim of this paper is to examine the implications of inclusion with the Amsterdam Treaty of the Schengen Agreement into the web of European legislation, as well as to disentangle the very process of this incorporation.","PeriodicalId":236925,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Europe (Topic)","volume":"516 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Europe (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2864913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the very onset of the European Union, the founding fathers and policy-makers have tasked themselves with the goal of free movement within the single market and ideally within united and borderless Europe. The two seemingly separate and independent developments allowed for the realization of these early aspirations for unhindered circulation within the territory of the larger EU; the gradual and step-by-step abolition of barriers to trade and movement in the name of economic integration as orchestrated by the Community on one hand, and the intergovernmental agreement binding a handful of states outside of the EU legal framework on the other. Intimately intertwined with the Single European Market, the latter-although originating from without of the European Community legislation- has significantly contributed to shifting from purely economic freedoms of workers to encompass also further non-economic rights of the remaining public. The incorporation into the EU legal framework and its current status can only hardly be explained without taking into account Schengen in tandem with the SEA. The aim of this paper is to examine the implications of inclusion with the Amsterdam Treaty of the Schengen Agreement into the web of European legislation, as well as to disentangle the very process of this incorporation.
随着时间的推移,申根协议生效
自欧盟成立之初,欧盟的缔造者和政策制定者就给自己设定了在单一市场内实现自由流动的目标,最好是在统一、无国界的欧洲实现自由流动。这两个看似分离和独立的发展使得在更大的欧盟领土内不受阻碍地流通的早期愿望得以实现;一方面,以经济一体化的名义逐步取消贸易和流动壁垒,这是由共同体精心策划的;另一方面,政府间协议约束了欧盟法律框架之外的少数国家。后者虽然起源于欧洲共同体立法之外,但与欧洲单一市场密切相关,对从工人的纯粹经济自由转向包括其余公众的进一步非经济权利作出了重大贡献。如果不考虑申根与东南亚经济区的结合,就很难解释申根纳入欧盟法律框架及其现状。本文的目的是研究将《申根协定阿姆斯特丹条约》纳入欧洲立法网络的影响,以及理清这一纳入的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信