Analysis of implementation status and effectiveness of treatments in the Chinese diagnosis and treatment recommendation for COVID-19 at local hospitals

Han Liu, Jing Jie, Jin-Wen Luo, Liping Peng, S. Hua, Lei Song, Dan Li
{"title":"Analysis of implementation status and effectiveness of treatments in the Chinese diagnosis and treatment recommendation for COVID-19 at local hospitals","authors":"Han Liu, Jing Jie, Jin-Wen Luo, Liping Peng, S. Hua, Lei Song, Dan Li","doi":"10.54844/cai.2022.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), China updated a total of seven editions of the official guidelines. We analyzed the treatment of patients to understand how the several editions of diagnosis and treatment recommendation guided the local medical institutions from a regional perspective. Methods: This study included a total of 93 patients who were suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. We analyzed the use of antiviral treatments, antibiotics, steroid, and life support measures in these patients. Based on the time of admission and the update of the official recommendations, we compared the treatments complied with the updated versions of the diagnosis and treatment recommendation. Results: All the 93 cases received different types of antiviral drugs. There were 41 cases of the use of antiviral drugs did not comply with the recommendations. There were 82 cases who received antibiotics, and 31 cases did not comply with the recommendations. 53 patients who received steroids, but only 3 patients comply with the recommendations. One patient was treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but the timing was delayed compared with the recommendations. 91 patients were cured and discharged, one died, and one was still treated in hospital for other diseases after being tested negative. Conclusions: The antiviral treatment initially involved too many types of drugs, and the duration of medication was too long. There was also an overuse of antibiotics. In addition, the use of steroids did not comply with the recommendations. The timing of intubation for mechanical ventilation and the timing of using ECMO were more conservative.","PeriodicalId":107566,"journal":{"name":"Community Acquired Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Acquired Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54844/cai.2022.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), China updated a total of seven editions of the official guidelines. We analyzed the treatment of patients to understand how the several editions of diagnosis and treatment recommendation guided the local medical institutions from a regional perspective. Methods: This study included a total of 93 patients who were suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19. We analyzed the use of antiviral treatments, antibiotics, steroid, and life support measures in these patients. Based on the time of admission and the update of the official recommendations, we compared the treatments complied with the updated versions of the diagnosis and treatment recommendation. Results: All the 93 cases received different types of antiviral drugs. There were 41 cases of the use of antiviral drugs did not comply with the recommendations. There were 82 cases who received antibiotics, and 31 cases did not comply with the recommendations. 53 patients who received steroids, but only 3 patients comply with the recommendations. One patient was treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but the timing was delayed compared with the recommendations. 91 patients were cured and discharged, one died, and one was still treated in hospital for other diseases after being tested negative. Conclusions: The antiviral treatment initially involved too many types of drugs, and the duration of medication was too long. There was also an overuse of antibiotics. In addition, the use of steroids did not comply with the recommendations. The timing of intubation for mechanical ventilation and the timing of using ECMO were more conservative.
中国地方医院新冠肺炎诊疗推荐方案实施现状及效果分析
背景:自2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)暴发以来,中国共更新了七版官方指南。我们对患者的治疗情况进行分析,从区域角度了解几个版本的诊疗建议如何指导当地医疗机构。方法:本研究共纳入93例COVID-19疑似或确诊病例。我们分析了这些患者抗病毒治疗、抗生素、类固醇和生命支持措施的使用情况。根据入院时间和官方建议的更新,我们比较了符合更新版本的诊断和治疗建议的治疗。结果:93例患者均接受不同类型抗病毒药物治疗。有41例使用抗病毒药物不符合建议。82例患者接受了抗生素治疗,31例患者不符合建议。53名患者接受了类固醇治疗,但只有3名患者遵守了建议。1例患者接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)治疗,但与建议相比时间延迟。91例治愈出院,1例死亡,1例阴性后仍在医院接受其他疾病治疗。结论:初期抗病毒治疗涉及药物种类过多,用药时间过长。抗生素也被过度使用。此外,类固醇的使用也不符合建议。机械通气插管时机和ECMO时机较为保守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信