Study of comparison of effect and complications of intravitreal triamcinolone injection of 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg in macular edema of vascular origin

Dr Kajal Kataria, Dr. Jignesh Gosai, Dr.Jignasa Makvana
{"title":"Study of comparison of effect and complications of intravitreal triamcinolone injection of 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg in macular edema of vascular origin","authors":"Dr Kajal Kataria, Dr. Jignesh Gosai, Dr.Jignasa Makvana","doi":"10.56018/bjkines2022121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses (1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg) of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in treatment of eyes with macular edema of vascular origin.Methods: Using simple random sampling among patients attending our tertiary healthcare referral centre, 60 patients fulfilling selection criteria were divided into 3 groups and were followed up for a period of 16 weeks. Following IVTA injections of different doses, patients were observed for changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract occurrence/ progression in all three groups at 1 week , 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks. Results: Following IVTA injection in all three groups (1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg), mean BCVA improvedfrom baseline but no statistically significant difference was observed in mean BCVA at different follow ups betweenthe three groups. Mean CFT significantly improved from baseline in all threegroups but no statistically significant difference was observed at different follow ups between groups. MeanIOP increasedfrom baseline in all three groupsbut no statistically significant difference was observed among groups at different follow ups. Anti glaucoma treatment was required at end of 16 weeks postoperatively in 0, 1 and 3 eyes receiving 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg IVTA respectively. Lenticular changes at the end of 16 weeks postoperatively were found in 0, 1 and 2 eyes with 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg IVTA respectively.Conclusion: 4 mg dose of IVTA improves the functional and anatomical outcome in macular edema of vascular origin in most patients followed by 2 mg dose. 1 mg and 2 mg dose of IVTA has less incidence of steroid induced elevation of IOP and lenticular opacity development or progression. Further large scale studies are recommended to compare the effectiveness and safety of different doses of IVTA. Keywords: Triamcinolone Acetonide, Macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion","PeriodicalId":430295,"journal":{"name":"BJKines National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJKines National Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56018/bjkines2022121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses (1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg) of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in treatment of eyes with macular edema of vascular origin.Methods: Using simple random sampling among patients attending our tertiary healthcare referral centre, 60 patients fulfilling selection criteria were divided into 3 groups and were followed up for a period of 16 weeks. Following IVTA injections of different doses, patients were observed for changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract occurrence/ progression in all three groups at 1 week , 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks. Results: Following IVTA injection in all three groups (1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg), mean BCVA improvedfrom baseline but no statistically significant difference was observed in mean BCVA at different follow ups betweenthe three groups. Mean CFT significantly improved from baseline in all threegroups but no statistically significant difference was observed at different follow ups between groups. MeanIOP increasedfrom baseline in all three groupsbut no statistically significant difference was observed among groups at different follow ups. Anti glaucoma treatment was required at end of 16 weeks postoperatively in 0, 1 and 3 eyes receiving 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg IVTA respectively. Lenticular changes at the end of 16 weeks postoperatively were found in 0, 1 and 2 eyes with 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg IVTA respectively.Conclusion: 4 mg dose of IVTA improves the functional and anatomical outcome in macular edema of vascular origin in most patients followed by 2 mg dose. 1 mg and 2 mg dose of IVTA has less incidence of steroid induced elevation of IOP and lenticular opacity development or progression. Further large scale studies are recommended to compare the effectiveness and safety of different doses of IVTA. Keywords: Triamcinolone Acetonide, Macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion
玻璃体内注射1、2、4 mg曲安奈德治疗血管性黄斑水肿的疗效及并发症比较研究
本研究旨在比较不同剂量曲安奈德(IVTA) (1mg、2mg和4mg)治疗血管性黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性。方法:采用简单随机抽样的方法,将60例符合选择标准的患者分为3组,随访16周。注射不同剂量的IVTA后,观察三组患者在1周、4周、12周和16周的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)中央中央窝厚度(CFT)、眼压(IOP)和白内障发生/进展的变化。结果:三组注射IVTA (1 mg、2 mg、4 mg)后,平均BCVA均较基线有所改善,但三组不同随访时间的平均BCVA差异无统计学意义。三组的平均CFT均较基线有显著改善,但在不同的随访中各组间无统计学差异。三组患者的平均眼压均较基线升高,但不同随访时间组间差异无统计学意义。术后16周,0眼、1眼和3眼分别接受1 mg、2 mg和4 mg IVTA治疗。IVTA分别给予1 mg、2 mg、4 mg,术后16周时0眼、1眼、2眼出现晶状体改变。结论:4mg剂量的IVTA能改善血管源性黄斑水肿的功能和解剖结果,其次是2mg剂量。1mg和2mg剂量的IVTA类固醇性IOP升高和晶状体混浊发生或进展的发生率较低。建议进一步进行大规模研究,以比较不同剂量IVTA的有效性和安全性。关键词:曲安奈德,黄斑水肿,糖尿病视网膜病变,视网膜静脉阻塞
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信