The Comparison between Spinal Anesthesia Bupivacaine and Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Cesarean Section on Apgar Score

T. Bisri, Elly Noer Rochmah, Arief Kurniawan, Angela Stella
{"title":"The Comparison between Spinal Anesthesia Bupivacaine and Sevoflurane \nAnesthesia for Cesarean Section on Apgar Score","authors":"T. Bisri, Elly Noer Rochmah, Arief Kurniawan, Angela Stella","doi":"10.35990/amhs.v1n3.p128-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of the anesthetic technique for cesarean section is still debatable because of the side \neffects caused by anesthesia for mothers and neonates. The succeed to determine anesthetic \ntechnique can be seen from the outcome of the final condition of the mother and the neonates. \nThe assessment of the succeed to determine anesthetic technique in neonates has been using the \nApgar score by assessing the clinical status of the newborn in the first and fifth minutes. This \nresearch is aimed to understand the comparison between Apgar scores in cesarean section using \ngeneral anesthesia sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine. This research is analytical \nretrospective with a cross-sectional study approach, using a total sample of 40 patients who \nperformed cesarean section from August to November 2021, the samples were taken by \nconsecutive sampling. The data was taken from the medical records of the Melinda Mother and \nChild Hospital, Bandung. The results of this research showed that there was no significant \ndifference in the APGAR Score first minute between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia \n(p=0,054) in the fifth minute (p=0,708). There was no effect on APGAR scores in the general \nanesthesia sevoflurane group and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine group, and both anesthetic \ngroups had a good effect on neonates","PeriodicalId":171840,"journal":{"name":"ACTA Medical Health Sciences","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA Medical Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35990/amhs.v1n3.p128-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of the anesthetic technique for cesarean section is still debatable because of the side effects caused by anesthesia for mothers and neonates. The succeed to determine anesthetic technique can be seen from the outcome of the final condition of the mother and the neonates. The assessment of the succeed to determine anesthetic technique in neonates has been using the Apgar score by assessing the clinical status of the newborn in the first and fifth minutes. This research is aimed to understand the comparison between Apgar scores in cesarean section using general anesthesia sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine. This research is analytical retrospective with a cross-sectional study approach, using a total sample of 40 patients who performed cesarean section from August to November 2021, the samples were taken by consecutive sampling. The data was taken from the medical records of the Melinda Mother and Child Hospital, Bandung. The results of this research showed that there was no significant difference in the APGAR Score first minute between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (p=0,054) in the fifth minute (p=0,708). There was no effect on APGAR scores in the general anesthesia sevoflurane group and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine group, and both anesthetic groups had a good effect on neonates
剖宫产术腰麻布比卡因与七氟醚麻醉对Apgar评分的比较
由于麻醉对母亲和新生儿造成的副作用,在剖宫产手术中使用麻醉技术仍然存在争议。从产妇和新生儿的最终情况可以看出麻醉技术的确定是否成功。评估新生儿麻醉技术的成功与否一直使用Apgar评分,通过评估新生儿在第一分钟和第五分钟的临床状态。本研究旨在了解七氟醚全身麻醉与布比卡因脊髓麻醉剖宫产术中Apgar评分的比较。本研究采用横断面研究方法,采用回顾性分析方法,共选取2021年8月至11月行剖宫产手术的患者40例为样本,采用连续抽样的方法采集样本。数据取自万隆梅林达妇幼医院的医疗记录。本研究结果显示,全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉第1分钟APGAR评分(p= 0.054)与第5分钟APGAR评分(p= 0.0708)无显著差异。全身麻醉七氟醚组和脊髓麻醉布比卡因组对新生儿APGAR评分无影响,两组麻醉对新生儿均有较好的效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信