T. Bisri, Elly Noer Rochmah, Arief Kurniawan, Angela Stella
{"title":"The Comparison between Spinal Anesthesia Bupivacaine and Sevoflurane \nAnesthesia for Cesarean Section on Apgar Score","authors":"T. Bisri, Elly Noer Rochmah, Arief Kurniawan, Angela Stella","doi":"10.35990/amhs.v1n3.p128-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of the anesthetic technique for cesarean section is still debatable because of the side \neffects caused by anesthesia for mothers and neonates. The succeed to determine anesthetic \ntechnique can be seen from the outcome of the final condition of the mother and the neonates. \nThe assessment of the succeed to determine anesthetic technique in neonates has been using the \nApgar score by assessing the clinical status of the newborn in the first and fifth minutes. This \nresearch is aimed to understand the comparison between Apgar scores in cesarean section using \ngeneral anesthesia sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine. This research is analytical \nretrospective with a cross-sectional study approach, using a total sample of 40 patients who \nperformed cesarean section from August to November 2021, the samples were taken by \nconsecutive sampling. The data was taken from the medical records of the Melinda Mother and \nChild Hospital, Bandung. The results of this research showed that there was no significant \ndifference in the APGAR Score first minute between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia \n(p=0,054) in the fifth minute (p=0,708). There was no effect on APGAR scores in the general \nanesthesia sevoflurane group and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine group, and both anesthetic \ngroups had a good effect on neonates","PeriodicalId":171840,"journal":{"name":"ACTA Medical Health Sciences","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA Medical Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35990/amhs.v1n3.p128-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of the anesthetic technique for cesarean section is still debatable because of the side
effects caused by anesthesia for mothers and neonates. The succeed to determine anesthetic
technique can be seen from the outcome of the final condition of the mother and the neonates.
The assessment of the succeed to determine anesthetic technique in neonates has been using the
Apgar score by assessing the clinical status of the newborn in the first and fifth minutes. This
research is aimed to understand the comparison between Apgar scores in cesarean section using
general anesthesia sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine. This research is analytical
retrospective with a cross-sectional study approach, using a total sample of 40 patients who
performed cesarean section from August to November 2021, the samples were taken by
consecutive sampling. The data was taken from the medical records of the Melinda Mother and
Child Hospital, Bandung. The results of this research showed that there was no significant
difference in the APGAR Score first minute between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia
(p=0,054) in the fifth minute (p=0,708). There was no effect on APGAR scores in the general
anesthesia sevoflurane group and spinal anesthesia bupivacaine group, and both anesthetic
groups had a good effect on neonates