Comparing the Effectiveness of Mode Deactivation Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Anxiety and Self-concept Clarity in Students with Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Hajar Adelifard, Moloud Keykhosrovani, S. Mousavi
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of Mode Deactivation Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Anxiety and Self-concept Clarity in Students with Generalized Anxiety Disorder","authors":"Hajar Adelifard, Moloud Keykhosrovani, S. Mousavi","doi":"10.5812/jcrps-137291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Students with a generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are so worried about potential events in the future that they cannot easily live at the moment and are unable to experience and enjoy positive and pleasant ongoing events. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of mode deactivation therapy (MDT) and Hofmann’s cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on anxiety and self-concept clarity in students with GAD. Methods: This quasi-experimental research adopted a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population included all high school students with GAD in Bushehr (Iran) in 2021. The convenience sampling method was employed to select 45 students as the sample, who were then randomly assigned to the MDT, CBT, and control groups (15 participants per group). The participants completed the state-trait anxiety inventory and the Self-concept Clarity Scale in two stages, pretest and posttest. The first experimental group received twelve weekly 120-minute sessions of an MDT program, whereas the second experimental group received twelve weekly 120-minute sessions of a CBT program. The analysis of covariance and the Bonferroni test was used for data analysis in SPSS-26. Results: The mean ± SD of the posttest score of state anxiety in MDT and CBT and control groups was 41.53 ± 3.33, 47.67 ± 5.39, and 58.67 ± 6.23, respectively. Moreover, the mean ± SD of the posttest score of trait anxiety in MDT and CBT and control groups was 43.80 ± 5.60, 48.47 ± 5.57, and 56.47 ± 4.04, respectively. Results indicated significant differences between the posttests of groups (P < 0.001). According to the results, both interventions alleviated anxiety and enhanced self-concept clarity in the experimental groups compared with the control group. Furthermore, MDT outperformed CBT in anxiety alleviation and self-concept clarity improvement. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT was more effective in treating patients with different needs and complications due to its personalized nature, whereas CBT was less efficient in treating non-anxiety disorders due to focusing mainly on social anxiety disorder.","PeriodicalId":254271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps-137291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Students with a generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are so worried about potential events in the future that they cannot easily live at the moment and are unable to experience and enjoy positive and pleasant ongoing events. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of mode deactivation therapy (MDT) and Hofmann’s cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on anxiety and self-concept clarity in students with GAD. Methods: This quasi-experimental research adopted a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population included all high school students with GAD in Bushehr (Iran) in 2021. The convenience sampling method was employed to select 45 students as the sample, who were then randomly assigned to the MDT, CBT, and control groups (15 participants per group). The participants completed the state-trait anxiety inventory and the Self-concept Clarity Scale in two stages, pretest and posttest. The first experimental group received twelve weekly 120-minute sessions of an MDT program, whereas the second experimental group received twelve weekly 120-minute sessions of a CBT program. The analysis of covariance and the Bonferroni test was used for data analysis in SPSS-26. Results: The mean ± SD of the posttest score of state anxiety in MDT and CBT and control groups was 41.53 ± 3.33, 47.67 ± 5.39, and 58.67 ± 6.23, respectively. Moreover, the mean ± SD of the posttest score of trait anxiety in MDT and CBT and control groups was 43.80 ± 5.60, 48.47 ± 5.57, and 56.47 ± 4.04, respectively. Results indicated significant differences between the posttests of groups (P < 0.001). According to the results, both interventions alleviated anxiety and enhanced self-concept clarity in the experimental groups compared with the control group. Furthermore, MDT outperformed CBT in anxiety alleviation and self-concept clarity improvement. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT was more effective in treating patients with different needs and complications due to its personalized nature, whereas CBT was less efficient in treating non-anxiety disorders due to focusing mainly on social anxiety disorder.
模式失活治疗与认知行为治疗对广泛性焦虑障碍学生焦虑和自我概念清晰度的影响比较
背景:患有广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的学生非常担心未来可能发生的事件,以至于他们无法轻松地生活在当下,也无法体验和享受积极愉快的正在发生的事件。目的:探讨模式失活疗法(MDT)和Hofmann认知行为疗法(CBT)对GAD学生焦虑和自我概念清晰度的影响。方法:准实验研究采用前测后测设计,设对照组。统计人群包括2021年伊朗布什尔市所有患有广泛性焦虑症的高中生。采用方便抽样法选取45名学生作为样本,随机分为MDT组、CBT组和对照组(每组15人)。被试分前测和后测两个阶段完成状态-特质焦虑量表和自我概念清晰度量表。第一个实验组每周接受12次120分钟的MDT治疗,而第二个实验组每周接受12次120分钟的CBT治疗。SPSS-26的数据分析采用协方差分析和Bonferroni检验。结果:MDT组、CBT组与对照组状态焦虑后测得分的平均值±SD分别为41.53±3.33、47.67±5.39、58.67±6.23。MDT组和CBT组与对照组的特质焦虑后测得分均值±SD分别为43.80±5.60、48.47±5.57和56.47±4.04。结果显示各组间后测差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结果表明,与对照组相比,两种干预措施均减轻了实验组的焦虑,提高了自我概念的清晰度。此外,MDT在焦虑缓解和自我概念清晰度改善方面优于CBT。结论:综上所述,MDT因其个性化的特点,对不同需求和并发症的患者更有效,而CBT因其主要关注社交焦虑障碍,对非焦虑障碍的治疗效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信