Invigorating innovation and entrepreneurship: Insights from selected South African and Scandinavian universities

T. Pitso
{"title":"Invigorating innovation and entrepreneurship: Insights from selected South African and Scandinavian universities","authors":"T. Pitso","doi":"10.4102/SAJESBM.V11I1.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  University innovation and entrepreneurship have evolved discretely and struggled with legitimacy, which marginalised them and vitiated their optimal societal impact. However, three recent developments have compelled universities to become innovative and entrepreneurial: workplace demands for creative and innovative graduates, chronic university underfunding and graduate unemployment. Therefore, this study sought to understand how universities in different geographic contexts fostered innovation and entrepreneurship. Aim:  The study aimed to: (1) better understand how innovation and entrepreneurship were fostered in each geographic location, (2) glean lessons for developing a new innovation and entrepreneurship model, (3) develop an integrated innovation and entrepreneurship model. Methods:  The study used semi-structured interviews conducted with 15 innovation and entrepreneurship senior managers drawn from five Scandinavian universities and three South African universities. Results:  Structurally and strategically, the innovation and entrepreneurship units are located outside the core faculty activities: (1) there are no direct linkages between faculty and these units’ activities. (2) Creativity and innovation are not explicitly taught in faculties. (3) Research agendas of faculties and these units are not mutually inclusive. Conclusion:  Faculty, innovation and entrepreneurship activities are not structurally and strategically linked.","PeriodicalId":274251,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJESBM.V11I1.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background:  University innovation and entrepreneurship have evolved discretely and struggled with legitimacy, which marginalised them and vitiated their optimal societal impact. However, three recent developments have compelled universities to become innovative and entrepreneurial: workplace demands for creative and innovative graduates, chronic university underfunding and graduate unemployment. Therefore, this study sought to understand how universities in different geographic contexts fostered innovation and entrepreneurship. Aim:  The study aimed to: (1) better understand how innovation and entrepreneurship were fostered in each geographic location, (2) glean lessons for developing a new innovation and entrepreneurship model, (3) develop an integrated innovation and entrepreneurship model. Methods:  The study used semi-structured interviews conducted with 15 innovation and entrepreneurship senior managers drawn from five Scandinavian universities and three South African universities. Results:  Structurally and strategically, the innovation and entrepreneurship units are located outside the core faculty activities: (1) there are no direct linkages between faculty and these units’ activities. (2) Creativity and innovation are not explicitly taught in faculties. (3) Research agendas of faculties and these units are not mutually inclusive. Conclusion:  Faculty, innovation and entrepreneurship activities are not structurally and strategically linked.
激发创新和创业精神:来自南非和斯堪的纳维亚大学的见解
背景:大学创新和企业家精神的发展是分散的,并与合法性作斗争,这使它们被边缘化,并削弱了它们的最佳社会影响。然而,最近的三个发展迫使大学变得创新和创业:工作场所对有创造力和创新能力的毕业生的需求,大学长期资金不足和毕业生失业。因此,本研究试图了解不同地理环境下的大学如何培养创新和创业精神。目的:本研究旨在:(1)更好地了解各地理区域的创新创业培育情况;(2)为构建新的创新创业模式收集经验教训;(3)构建一体化创新创业模式。方法:采用半结构化访谈法,对来自斯堪的纳维亚五所大学和南非三所大学的15名创新创业高级管理人员进行访谈。结果:从结构和战略上看,创新创业单位位于核心教师活动之外:(1)教师与创新创业单位活动之间没有直接联系;(2)学校没有明确教授创造和创新。(3)院系和单位的研究议程不相互包容。结论:教师、创新和创业活动在结构和战略上没有联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信