BEING INVOLVED OR INFORMATIVE: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF PRONOUNS AND SPECIFIERS IN WRITING CONCLUSIONS

Dian Agustina Purwanto Wakerkwa
{"title":"BEING INVOLVED OR INFORMATIVE: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF PRONOUNS AND SPECIFIERS IN WRITING CONCLUSIONS","authors":"Dian Agustina Purwanto Wakerkwa","doi":"10.22515/ljbs.v8i1.5632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion comprises the summary of the study. It is where the authors present their last words about the findings while introducing some suggestions on the issue. Gender is believed to be one of social factors that shapes someone’s communication style, be it oral or written. This study aimed to explore the differences in the use of pronouns and noun specifiers by authors of different genders in composing the conclusions of their research articles. It observed how pronouns and specifiers are manifested differently in the texts and the different intentions behind their use. Ten research articles’ conclusions were randomly selected based on gender of the authors five of each gender from one Indonesian journal in the field of language study. This study is qualitative, thus, the data are analyzed and presented in words to a draw clear interpretation of the issue. The findings revealed the differences in the tendency of female and male authors in utilizing both linguistic features in the conclusions. It was discovered that female authors utilized more pronouns and male authors, on the other hand, used more noun specifiers in their texts.","PeriodicalId":398772,"journal":{"name":"LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":"238 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v8i1.5632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conclusion comprises the summary of the study. It is where the authors present their last words about the findings while introducing some suggestions on the issue. Gender is believed to be one of social factors that shapes someone’s communication style, be it oral or written. This study aimed to explore the differences in the use of pronouns and noun specifiers by authors of different genders in composing the conclusions of their research articles. It observed how pronouns and specifiers are manifested differently in the texts and the different intentions behind their use. Ten research articles’ conclusions were randomly selected based on gender of the authors five of each gender from one Indonesian journal in the field of language study. This study is qualitative, thus, the data are analyzed and presented in words to a draw clear interpretation of the issue. The findings revealed the differences in the tendency of female and male authors in utilizing both linguistic features in the conclusions. It was discovered that female authors utilized more pronouns and male authors, on the other hand, used more noun specifiers in their texts.
参与性或信息性:在撰写结论时使用代词和说明词的性别差异
结论部分是对研究的总结。这是作者对研究结果的最后陈述,同时介绍了一些关于这个问题的建议。性别被认为是影响一个人沟通方式的社会因素之一,无论是口头还是书面。本研究旨在探讨不同性别的作者在撰写研究文章结论时代词和名词指示语的使用差异。本文观察了代词和指示词在语篇中的不同表现及其使用背后的不同意图。根据作者的性别随机选择了10篇研究文章的结论,这些文章分别来自印度尼西亚语言研究领域的一份期刊。本研究是定性的,因此,对数据进行分析并以文字形式呈现,以明确解释问题。研究结果揭示了男女作者在结论中使用这两种语言特征的倾向存在差异。研究发现,女性作者更多地使用代词,而男性作者则更多地使用名词定语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信