Integrable, High-efficiency Vertical-cavity Laser Arrays For Smart Pixels

L. Coldren, B. Thibeault, J. Scott
{"title":"Integrable, High-efficiency Vertical-cavity Laser Arrays For Smart Pixels","authors":"L. Coldren, B. Thibeault, J. Scott","doi":"10.1109/LEOSST.1994.700459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work with intra-cavity contacted vertical-cavity lasers on semi-insulating substrates has resulted in very efficient, high speed arrays of devices that are compatible with integration with electronic circuits. This and other related work will be reviewed. Due to inherent geometrical advantages, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) are attractive candidates for smart pixel schemes which require 1-D or 2-D arrays that emit light normal to the chip surface. Recent improvements in these devices have resulted in temperature insensitive operation [I], drive voltages e 3 Volts [2-41, wall-plug efficiencies as high as 17.3% [2], and lateral side-mode supression as high as 2.6 mW [5]. This surge in performance now makes hybrid or monolithic integration of arrays of VCSELs with electronic circuits a desirable pursuit. To realize the full integration capability of VCSELs, we have recently made devices with intra-cavity contacts on semi-insulating substrates to reduce parasitic capacitances, electrically isolate devices, and provide both contacts on the top surface. [6, 71 This improvement pushes the high-speed performance limit to the intrinsic bandwidth limitation of the laser active region, eliminates electrical crosstalk, allows for more driver circuit configurations, facilitates high speed packaging and hybrid integration, and allows for wafer level microwave probing. Figure 1 shows a schematic picture of the two types of devices fabricated. Device A uses a single n-type intra-cavity contact and low-barrier (Al0.67Gao.33AslGaAs) p-type top distributed Bragg reflector DBR, while device B uses two intra-cavity contacts to inject the current. Both devices have unintentionally doped bottom DBRs and use current spreading layers in the intracavity contact regions to reduce the effects of current crowding. The D.C. performance of both devices compares well with the best reported VCSEL results. Wall-plug efficiencies for both devices are shown in Fig. 2. In both cases, the small devices (7 pm for device B and 6 pm for device A) have their peak efficiencies near 1mW of output power with currents less than 4 mA and input powers less than 12 mW. This type of operation is good for high density arrays, where high efficiency at low power consumption levels is needed. The larger devices have higher wallplug efficiencies at higher input powers, but are capable of producing more than 3mW of power. This larger size is good for applications requiring lower densities, but higher fan-outs. High-speed measurements on arrays of device B have also recently been made. Figure 3 shows an SEM picture of a high-speed array with on-chip microwave lines and Fig. 4 shows the 3dB bandwidth versus bias level for the various diameter devices. The 7 pm laser achieves a thermally limited 8.5 GHz of modulation at a bias of only 4 mA with a modulation efficiency of 5.7GHz/z/mA ( higher than any in-plane laser reported). All sizes are capable of more than 5 GHz maximum modulation. For computer interconnects or smart-pixels low bit-error rates are also needed to ensure computational integrity. Preliminary results show low bit error rates for all device sizes. In summary, recent results from intra-cavity contacted VCSELs show performance levels desirable for smart-pixel arrays. The devices arc: low power consumers ( -lOmW) at their maximum efficiencies( 1 O%), deliver high-speed error-free output, and provide flexibility for different integration schemes. Electrical and thermal measurements indicate that more optimization of the device designs will improve the efficiencies and modulation bandwidths further.","PeriodicalId":379594,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEE/LEOS Summer Topical Meetings: Integrated Optoelectronics","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEE/LEOS Summer Topical Meetings: Integrated Optoelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOSST.1994.700459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent work with intra-cavity contacted vertical-cavity lasers on semi-insulating substrates has resulted in very efficient, high speed arrays of devices that are compatible with integration with electronic circuits. This and other related work will be reviewed. Due to inherent geometrical advantages, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) are attractive candidates for smart pixel schemes which require 1-D or 2-D arrays that emit light normal to the chip surface. Recent improvements in these devices have resulted in temperature insensitive operation [I], drive voltages e 3 Volts [2-41, wall-plug efficiencies as high as 17.3% [2], and lateral side-mode supression as high as 2.6 mW [5]. This surge in performance now makes hybrid or monolithic integration of arrays of VCSELs with electronic circuits a desirable pursuit. To realize the full integration capability of VCSELs, we have recently made devices with intra-cavity contacts on semi-insulating substrates to reduce parasitic capacitances, electrically isolate devices, and provide both contacts on the top surface. [6, 71 This improvement pushes the high-speed performance limit to the intrinsic bandwidth limitation of the laser active region, eliminates electrical crosstalk, allows for more driver circuit configurations, facilitates high speed packaging and hybrid integration, and allows for wafer level microwave probing. Figure 1 shows a schematic picture of the two types of devices fabricated. Device A uses a single n-type intra-cavity contact and low-barrier (Al0.67Gao.33AslGaAs) p-type top distributed Bragg reflector DBR, while device B uses two intra-cavity contacts to inject the current. Both devices have unintentionally doped bottom DBRs and use current spreading layers in the intracavity contact regions to reduce the effects of current crowding. The D.C. performance of both devices compares well with the best reported VCSEL results. Wall-plug efficiencies for both devices are shown in Fig. 2. In both cases, the small devices (7 pm for device B and 6 pm for device A) have their peak efficiencies near 1mW of output power with currents less than 4 mA and input powers less than 12 mW. This type of operation is good for high density arrays, where high efficiency at low power consumption levels is needed. The larger devices have higher wallplug efficiencies at higher input powers, but are capable of producing more than 3mW of power. This larger size is good for applications requiring lower densities, but higher fan-outs. High-speed measurements on arrays of device B have also recently been made. Figure 3 shows an SEM picture of a high-speed array with on-chip microwave lines and Fig. 4 shows the 3dB bandwidth versus bias level for the various diameter devices. The 7 pm laser achieves a thermally limited 8.5 GHz of modulation at a bias of only 4 mA with a modulation efficiency of 5.7GHz/z/mA ( higher than any in-plane laser reported). All sizes are capable of more than 5 GHz maximum modulation. For computer interconnects or smart-pixels low bit-error rates are also needed to ensure computational integrity. Preliminary results show low bit error rates for all device sizes. In summary, recent results from intra-cavity contacted VCSELs show performance levels desirable for smart-pixel arrays. The devices arc: low power consumers ( -lOmW) at their maximum efficiencies( 1 O%), deliver high-speed error-free output, and provide flexibility for different integration schemes. Electrical and thermal measurements indicate that more optimization of the device designs will improve the efficiencies and modulation bandwidths further.
用于智能像素的可积高效垂直腔激光阵列
最近在半绝缘衬底上对腔内接触垂直腔激光器的研究已经产生了非常高效、高速的器件阵列,这些器件与电子电路集成兼容。将对这项工作和其他相关工作进行审查。由于其固有的几何优势,垂直腔面发射激光器(VCSELs)是智能像素方案的有吸引力的候选者,这些方案需要一维或二维阵列发射垂直于芯片表面的光。最近对这些器件进行了改进,实现了对温度不敏感的工作[1],驱动电压为3伏[2-41],插头效率高达17.3%[2],侧向模式抑制高达2.6 mW[5]。这种性能的激增现在使得vcsel阵列与电子电路的混合或单片集成成为一种理想的追求。为了实现vcsel的完全集成能力,我们最近在半绝缘衬底上制造了具有腔内触点的器件,以减少寄生电容,电隔离器件,并在顶表面提供两个触点。[6,71]这一改进将高速性能限制推至激光有源区域的固有带宽限制,消除了电串扰,允许更多的驱动电路配置,促进高速封装和混合集成,并允许晶圆级微波探测。图1显示了制造的两种类型的器件的示意图。器件A采用单个n型腔内触点和低势垒(Al0.67Gao.33AslGaAs) p型顶部分布式Bragg反射器DBR,器件B采用两个腔内触点注入电流。这两种器件都无意中掺杂了底部dbr,并在腔内接触区使用电流扩散层来减少电流拥挤的影响。这两种器件的直流性能都与报道的最佳VCSEL结果相媲美。两种装置的壁插效率如图2所示。在这两种情况下,小器件(器件B为7 pm,器件A为6 pm)的峰值效率接近1mW输出功率,电流小于4ma,输入功率小于12mw。这种类型的操作适用于高密度阵列,需要在低功耗水平下实现高效率。较大的器件在更高的输入功率下具有更高的壁塞效率,但能够产生超过3mW的功率。这种较大的尺寸适用于需要较低密度但较高扇出的应用。最近还对设备B的阵列进行了高速测量。图3显示了带有片上微波线的高速阵列的SEM图,图4显示了不同直径器件的3dB带宽与偏置电平的关系。7 pm激光器在仅4 mA的偏置下实现了8.5 GHz的热限制调制,调制效率为5.7GHz/z/mA(高于任何平面内激光器)。所有尺寸都能够超过5 GHz的最大调制。对于计算机互连或智能像素,还需要低误码率来确保计算完整性。初步结果显示,所有设备尺寸的误码率都很低。总之,腔内接触vcsel的最新结果显示了智能像素阵列所需的性能水平。这些器件是低功耗(-lOmW)的最大效率(1%),提供高速无错误输出,并为不同的集成方案提供灵活性。电学和热测量表明,进一步优化器件设计将进一步提高效率和调制带宽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信