STEIN UNBIASED RISK ESTIMATE AS A MODEL SELECTION ESTIMATOR

Nihad Nouri, Algeria Applied Economy, Fatiha Mezoued
{"title":"STEIN UNBIASED RISK ESTIMATE AS A MODEL SELECTION ESTIMATOR","authors":"Nihad Nouri, Algeria Applied Economy, Fatiha Mezoued","doi":"10.46529/socioint.2020256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To restore a low-rank structure from a noisy matrix, many recent authors has used and studied truncated singular value decomposition. So thus, according to these studies, the image can be better estimated by shrinking the singular values as well. This paper is concerned with additive models of the form Y = M +E, where Y is an observed n×m matrix with m < n, M is an unknown n×m matrix of interest with low rank, and E is a random noise. For a family of estimators of which is obtained from shrinkage functions ϕ λ (σ i ) based on the singular values decomposition of the matrix Y, we are interested in the performance of the model proposed by Candès et al (2012) for other thresholding function (Minimax Concave Penalty (MCP)), and under the assumption that the distribution of data matrix Y is multivariate t-Student distribution that belongs to an elliptically distribution family which extends the Gaussian case. Under this distributional context, we propose to apply stein unbiased risk estimate (SURE) improved by S. Canu and D. Fourdrinier (2017), in order to select the best thresholding function between Minimax Concave Penalty (MCP) and Soft-thersholding, and also to find the optimal shrinking parameter λ from the data Y. Numerical results reveal that the risk estimate SURE is good, the minima are reached for the same lambda λ (λ ∗ = = 5218.4) and the difference between the estimated (SURE) and the usual (Mean Square Error (MSE)) risks is low, and that the risk of MCP is lower than SOFT. estimate, mean square error, elliptical distribution, singular value decomposition, minimax concave penalty, soft-thresholding.","PeriodicalId":189259,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2020- 7th International Conference on Education and Education of Social Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2020- 7th International Conference on Education and Education of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46529/socioint.2020256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To restore a low-rank structure from a noisy matrix, many recent authors has used and studied truncated singular value decomposition. So thus, according to these studies, the image can be better estimated by shrinking the singular values as well. This paper is concerned with additive models of the form Y = M +E, where Y is an observed n×m matrix with m < n, M is an unknown n×m matrix of interest with low rank, and E is a random noise. For a family of estimators of which is obtained from shrinkage functions ϕ λ (σ i ) based on the singular values decomposition of the matrix Y, we are interested in the performance of the model proposed by Candès et al (2012) for other thresholding function (Minimax Concave Penalty (MCP)), and under the assumption that the distribution of data matrix Y is multivariate t-Student distribution that belongs to an elliptically distribution family which extends the Gaussian case. Under this distributional context, we propose to apply stein unbiased risk estimate (SURE) improved by S. Canu and D. Fourdrinier (2017), in order to select the best thresholding function between Minimax Concave Penalty (MCP) and Soft-thersholding, and also to find the optimal shrinking parameter λ from the data Y. Numerical results reveal that the risk estimate SURE is good, the minima are reached for the same lambda λ (λ ∗ = = 5218.4) and the difference between the estimated (SURE) and the usual (Mean Square Error (MSE)) risks is low, and that the risk of MCP is lower than SOFT. estimate, mean square error, elliptical distribution, singular value decomposition, minimax concave penalty, soft-thresholding.
Stein无偏风险估计作为模型选择估计量
为了从噪声矩阵中恢复低秩结构,近年来许多作者使用并研究了截断奇异值分解。因此,根据这些研究,也可以通过缩小奇异值来更好地估计图像。本文研究形式为Y = M +E的可加性模型,其中Y是M < n的观测n×m矩阵,M是低秩的未知n×m感兴趣矩阵,E是随机噪声。对于基于矩阵Y的奇异值分解从收缩函数φ λ (σ i)获得的一组估计量,我们感兴趣的是cand等人(2012)对其他阈值函数(Minimax凹惩罚(MCP))提出的模型的性能,并且假设数据矩阵Y的分布是多元t-Student分布,属于扩展高斯情况的椭圆分布族。在这种分布背景下,我们提出采用S. Canu和D. Fourdrinier(2017)改进的stein无偏风险估计(SURE),以便在Minimax凹惩罚(MCP)和soft - thershhold之间选择最佳阈值函数,并从数据y中找到最优收缩参数λ。对于相同的λ λ (λ∗= = 5218.4)达到最小值,估计风险(SURE)与通常风险(均方误差(MSE))之间的差很低,MCP的风险低于SOFT。估计,均方误差,椭圆分布,奇异值分解,极大极小凹惩罚,软阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信