Individuals and Communities

Peter L. Larson
{"title":"Individuals and Communities","authors":"Peter L. Larson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192849878.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Village and parish communities persisted despite agricultural, religious, and political upheaval. Families stayed in the general area but moved to different villages and back again; this included villages in other neighbouring parishes. The reason these strong communities persisted despite changes that radically reshaped communities elsewhere lay in the leadership. In each village there was an oligarchy of wealthy peasant and then yeomen families who had been in the parish for generations; they served as manorial court jurors and churchwardens; these were also the men most likely to focus on commercial agriculture and more ‘individualistic’ practices. There was scope for individual actions, but there were also boundaries. This can be seen in reactions to the rebellion in 1569 and the English Civil War; conformity was key.","PeriodicalId":294337,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking the Great Transition","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking the Great Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192849878.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Village and parish communities persisted despite agricultural, religious, and political upheaval. Families stayed in the general area but moved to different villages and back again; this included villages in other neighbouring parishes. The reason these strong communities persisted despite changes that radically reshaped communities elsewhere lay in the leadership. In each village there was an oligarchy of wealthy peasant and then yeomen families who had been in the parish for generations; they served as manorial court jurors and churchwardens; these were also the men most likely to focus on commercial agriculture and more ‘individualistic’ practices. There was scope for individual actions, but there were also boundaries. This can be seen in reactions to the rebellion in 1569 and the English Civil War; conformity was key.
个人和社区
尽管农业、宗教和政治动荡,村庄和教区社区依然存在。家庭留在一般地区,但搬到不同的村庄,然后又搬回来;这包括其他邻近教区的村庄。尽管其他地方的社区发生了根本性的变化,但这些强大的社区仍然存在,原因在于领导层。每个村庄都有富农和自耕农家族组成的寡头政治,他们在教区生活了好几代;他们曾担任庄园法庭陪审员和教堂管理员;这些男性也最有可能专注于商业农业和更“个人主义”的做法。有个人行动的空间,但也有界限。这可以从1569年叛乱和英国内战中看出;一致性是关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信