Modernity and Otherness: Based on Works of Bulgarian and Korean Literature

Ludmila Atanasova
{"title":"Modernity and Otherness: Based on Works of Bulgarian and Korean Literature","authors":"Ludmila Atanasova","doi":"10.55206/wlqy6992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The current study seeks to uncover the relationship between modernity and otherness and to explore how the processes of modernization are construed as processes of dealing with otherness in seminal literary works from Bulgaria and Korea. For countries such as these, modernity is associated with the necessity to import foreign (Western European) modes of social life, that causes societies to encounter all-encompassing otherness with which they need to deal over shorter periods of time. While regarding the societies that were under the direct colonial power of the West, modernization has been predominantly analysed in the context of postcolonial studies, modernisation processes in societies outside the colonial space have mainly been studied from the viewpoint of social development and desire for progress motivated from within the society. Inquiring into well-established theoretical explorations of modernity and otherness, the current study makes the point that the latter type of societies, to which Bulgaria and Korea belong, has not been spared from the influence of colonial discourse, which has become a reason for othering the traditional in relation to the modern in the process of modernization. The construction of the local and the traditional as otherness, or self-otherisation, is illustrated through the analysis of two works of literature from the period of modernization, that are fundamentally important in the literary canons of Bulgaria and Korea – Aleko Konstantinov’s “Bai Ganyo: Incredible Tales of a Modern Bulgarian” and Yi Kwangsu’s “Mujeong”. Key words: otherness, self-othering, modernity, modernization, Bulgarian literature, Korean literature, postcolonial theory.","PeriodicalId":215869,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric and Communications","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55206/wlqy6992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The current study seeks to uncover the relationship between modernity and otherness and to explore how the processes of modernization are construed as processes of dealing with otherness in seminal literary works from Bulgaria and Korea. For countries such as these, modernity is associated with the necessity to import foreign (Western European) modes of social life, that causes societies to encounter all-encompassing otherness with which they need to deal over shorter periods of time. While regarding the societies that were under the direct colonial power of the West, modernization has been predominantly analysed in the context of postcolonial studies, modernisation processes in societies outside the colonial space have mainly been studied from the viewpoint of social development and desire for progress motivated from within the society. Inquiring into well-established theoretical explorations of modernity and otherness, the current study makes the point that the latter type of societies, to which Bulgaria and Korea belong, has not been spared from the influence of colonial discourse, which has become a reason for othering the traditional in relation to the modern in the process of modernization. The construction of the local and the traditional as otherness, or self-otherisation, is illustrated through the analysis of two works of literature from the period of modernization, that are fundamentally important in the literary canons of Bulgaria and Korea – Aleko Konstantinov’s “Bai Ganyo: Incredible Tales of a Modern Bulgarian” and Yi Kwangsu’s “Mujeong”. Key words: otherness, self-othering, modernity, modernization, Bulgarian literature, Korean literature, postcolonial theory.
现代性与他性——以保加利亚和韩国文学作品为例
摘要:本研究旨在揭示现代性与他者性之间的关系,并探讨保加利亚和韩国的开创性文学作品如何将现代化过程解释为处理他者性的过程。对于这些国家来说,现代性是与引进外国(西欧)社会生活模式的必要性联系在一起的,这导致社会遇到了无所不包的他者,他们需要在较短的时间内处理。对于在西方直接殖民权力下的社会,现代化主要在后殖民研究的背景下进行分析,而殖民空间以外社会的现代化进程主要从社会发展和社会内部对进步的渴望的角度进行研究。通过对现代性和他者性的成熟理论探索,本研究指出,保加利亚和韩国所属的后一种社会类型并没有幸免于殖民话语的影响,这已经成为在现代化进程中将传统与现代联系起来的一个原因。通过对康斯坦丁诺夫的《白干约:一个现代保加利亚人的难以置信的故事》和李光苏的《木井》这两部在保加利亚和韩国文学经典中具有重要意义的现代化时期文学作品的分析,阐释了地方和传统作为他者性或自我他者化的建构。关键词:他者性,自我他者,现代性,现代化,保加利亚文学,韩国文学,后殖民理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信