Dental Implant Outcomes in Grafted Sockets: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A. Ramanauskaite, Tiago Borges, B. Almeida, A. Correia
{"title":"Dental Implant Outcomes in Grafted Sockets: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"A. Ramanauskaite, Tiago Borges, B. Almeida, A. Correia","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2019.10308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the treatment outcomes of the dental implants placed in the grafted sockets. Material and Methods A search protocol was developed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of dental implants placed in the grafted sockets in terms of implant survival rates (primary outcome), marginal-bone-level (MBL) changes, clinical parameters (i.e., bleeding on probing, probing depth), occurrence of peri-implant diseases, and aesthetic outcomes (secondary outcomes). Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and prospective studies with at least 12 months of follow-up and a minimum of 10 patients having at least one dental implant inserted into the grafted socket were conducted. MEDLINE (PubMed) was searched for relevant articles published until 1st April 2019. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model on the selected qualifying articles. Results The present analysis included 7 RCTs. The survival rate of the implants inserted into the grafted sockets ranged from 95 to 100% after 1 to 4 years of follow-up. MBL loss was found to be significantly greater for the implants placed in the non-grafted healed sites than for those placed in the previously grafted sockets (weighted mean difference = -1.961 mm, P < 0.0001). In terms of MBL changes, no difference was detected between immediately inserted implants versus implants placed in previously grafted sockets. None of the included studies reported on the clinical parameters or occurrence of peri-implant diseases Conclusions Implants inserted into the previously grafted sockets showed high survival rates and lower marginal-bone-level loss than the implants inserted into the non-grafted sites.","PeriodicalId":230885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","volume":"386 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the treatment outcomes of the dental implants placed in the grafted sockets. Material and Methods A search protocol was developed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of dental implants placed in the grafted sockets in terms of implant survival rates (primary outcome), marginal-bone-level (MBL) changes, clinical parameters (i.e., bleeding on probing, probing depth), occurrence of peri-implant diseases, and aesthetic outcomes (secondary outcomes). Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and prospective studies with at least 12 months of follow-up and a minimum of 10 patients having at least one dental implant inserted into the grafted socket were conducted. MEDLINE (PubMed) was searched for relevant articles published until 1st April 2019. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model on the selected qualifying articles. Results The present analysis included 7 RCTs. The survival rate of the implants inserted into the grafted sockets ranged from 95 to 100% after 1 to 4 years of follow-up. MBL loss was found to be significantly greater for the implants placed in the non-grafted healed sites than for those placed in the previously grafted sockets (weighted mean difference = -1.961 mm, P < 0.0001). In terms of MBL changes, no difference was detected between immediately inserted implants versus implants placed in previously grafted sockets. None of the included studies reported on the clinical parameters or occurrence of peri-implant diseases Conclusions Implants inserted into the previously grafted sockets showed high survival rates and lower marginal-bone-level loss than the implants inserted into the non-grafted sites.
牙槽骨移植的种植效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析
【摘要】目的评价牙槽内种植体的治疗效果。材料和方法制定了一项搜索方案,从种植体存活率(主要结果)、边缘骨水平(MBL)变化、临床参数(即探诊时出血、探诊深度)、种植体周围疾病的发生和美学结果(次要结果)等方面评估种植体放置在移植牙槽内的治疗结果。随机对照临床试验(rct)、对照临床试验和前瞻性研究进行了至少12个月的随访,至少10例患者至少有一颗牙种植体插入到移植的牙槽中。在MEDLINE (PubMed)检索到2019年4月1日之前发表的相关文章。采用随机效应模型对入选的符合条件的文章进行meta分析。结果本分析纳入7项随机对照试验。随访1 ~ 4年后,种植体在移植窝内的成活率为95% ~ 100%。结果发现,植入未移植愈合部位的MBL损失明显大于植入先前移植的槽位的MBL损失(加权平均差= -1.961 mm, P < 0.0001)。就MBL的变化而言,立即插入的种植体与先前移植的种植体之间没有差异。这些纳入的研究均未报道临床参数或种植体周围疾病的发生。结论与未移植的种植体相比,种植体插入先前移植过的种植体存活率高,边缘骨水平损失小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信