Evaluative Dichotomy in the Russian Language and its Reflection in Fiction Texts (Based on Alexander T. Tvardovsky’s Collection of Poems «Motherland and Foreign Lands»)

Ludmila Smirnova
{"title":"Evaluative Dichotomy in the Russian Language and its Reflection in Fiction \nTexts (Based on Alexander T. Tvardovsky’s Collection of Poems \n«Motherland and Foreign Lands»)","authors":"Ludmila Smirnova","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2022-59-3-53-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the evaluative dichotomy in the Russian language and its realization in the fiction text. It determines the possibility of using the term «dichotomy» as regards linguistic assessment. The paper links dichotomy of assessment \nto the binary perception of the world by humans. The writer points out differences between the category of evaluation and modality, expressiveness and emotiveness. The article focuses on the main parameters of assessment, they are attachment \nto the subject of assessment, reliance on the norms of estimation of the world and conventional rules of conduct, a possibility of The writer states the asymmetry of evaluative resources of the Russian language and \nthe broad presence of vocabulary with a pejorative component of assessment. \nIn addition, the text highlights the correlation between assessment and the var- \nious types of paradigmatic relations of words, mainly, antonymy. The writer states that \nantonymic oppositions largely determine the evaluative coloring of linguistic units in \nthe literary text (words, thematic groups and semantic fields) and, on top of that, \nA. Tvardovsky’s emotions. It illustrates this postulation by examples from «Motherland \nand Foreign Lands». \nThe essays that A. Tvardovsky wrote during World War II reveal the antonymic \nand evaluative opposition of images, which he unveils right in the title. These are \npeaceful life and war, Russia and foreign countries, Soviet power and «Germanity», \nthe Russians and the Germans, the specific features of their conduct and everyday hab- \nits, and perception of beauty. The poet’s antagonism of images and emotional sensations are revealed through units with evaluative components. He uses the general evaluative words, antonymy (including the contextual one), and evaluative oxymorons.intensification and de-intensification of eval- \nuative markers, and the implementation of assessment as a type of pragmatic meaning.","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2022-59-3-53-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the evaluative dichotomy in the Russian language and its realization in the fiction text. It determines the possibility of using the term «dichotomy» as regards linguistic assessment. The paper links dichotomy of assessment to the binary perception of the world by humans. The writer points out differences between the category of evaluation and modality, expressiveness and emotiveness. The article focuses on the main parameters of assessment, they are attachment to the subject of assessment, reliance on the norms of estimation of the world and conventional rules of conduct, a possibility of The writer states the asymmetry of evaluative resources of the Russian language and the broad presence of vocabulary with a pejorative component of assessment. In addition, the text highlights the correlation between assessment and the var- ious types of paradigmatic relations of words, mainly, antonymy. The writer states that antonymic oppositions largely determine the evaluative coloring of linguistic units in the literary text (words, thematic groups and semantic fields) and, on top of that, A. Tvardovsky’s emotions. It illustrates this postulation by examples from «Motherland and Foreign Lands». The essays that A. Tvardovsky wrote during World War II reveal the antonymic and evaluative opposition of images, which he unveils right in the title. These are peaceful life and war, Russia and foreign countries, Soviet power and «Germanity», the Russians and the Germans, the specific features of their conduct and everyday hab- its, and perception of beauty. The poet’s antagonism of images and emotional sensations are revealed through units with evaluative components. He uses the general evaluative words, antonymy (including the contextual one), and evaluative oxymorons.intensification and de-intensification of eval- uative markers, and the implementation of assessment as a type of pragmatic meaning.
俄语中的评价二分法及其在小说文本中的反映(以特瓦尔多夫斯基诗集《祖国与异乡》为例)
本文探讨了俄语中的评价二分法及其在小说文本中的实现。它决定了在语言评估方面使用术语“二分法”的可能性。本文将评估的二分法与人类对世界的二元感知联系起来。作者指出了评价范畴与情态、表现性与情绪性的区别。本文着重论述了俄语评价的主要参数,即对评价主体的依恋、对世界评价准则和传统行为准则的依赖、俄语评价资源的不对称以及俄语评价中贬义词汇的广泛存在。此外,本文还强调了评价与各种类型的词的范式关系的相关性,主要是反义词。作者指出,反义对立在很大程度上决定了文学文本中语言单位(词、主题组和语义场)的评价色彩,最重要的是,A.特瓦多夫斯基的情感。它用《祖国与外国》中的例子说明了这一假设。特瓦多夫斯基在第二次世界大战期间写的文章揭示了图像的反义词和评价对立,他在标题中揭示了这一点。这些是和平生活和战争,俄罗斯和外国,苏联权力和“德国”,俄罗斯人和德国人,他们的行为和日常习惯的具体特征,以及对美的感知。诗人对意象和情感的对抗是通过具有评价成分的单元来表现的。他运用了一般评价词、反义词(包括上下文反义词)、评价矛盾修辞、评价标记的强化和去强化,以及评价作为一种语用意义的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信