A Guide to Ground in Kant’sLectures on Metaphysics

Nicholas F. Stang
{"title":"A Guide to Ground in Kant’sLectures on Metaphysics","authors":"Nicholas F. Stang","doi":"10.1017/9781316819142.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) says that everything has a reason that fully explains it. Leibniz expresses the PSR in Latin and French, respectively, as the principle that everything has a ratio or raison. When German philosophers of the eighteenth century, heavily influenced by the Leibnizian writings available to them, formulated similar ideas in their native tongue, they translated ratio as Grund and expressed the PSR accordingly as: Everything has a ground that fully explains it. This Principle of Sufficient Ground (Satz des zureichenden Grundes) or PSG is, so to speak, the Leibnizian PSR translated into German. The PSG – how to correctly formulate it, whether it holds without restriction – became one of the major topics of debate within the Leibnizian tradition of late eighteenth-century German philosophy, commonly known as German rationalism. It comes as no surprise then that Kant, steeped as he was in German rationalism and its debates, would extensively discuss the PSG and the notion of ground (Grund) in the metaphysics lectures he gave virtually every semester at the University of Königsberg from 1755 until his retirement from teaching in 1796. Nearly every extant transcript of those lectures contains extended discussions of the correct definition of “ground,” critical comments on the views of his near contemporaries (especially those of Wolff, Baumgarten and Crusius) about what grounds are, distinctions among different kinds of ground and considerations about the correct formulation and range of application of the PSG. While scholars have extensively discussed Kant’s treatment of the PSG in the Antinomies chapter of the Critique of Pure Reason, and, more","PeriodicalId":397122,"journal":{"name":"Kant's <I>Lectures on Metaphysics</I>","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kant's <I>Lectures on Metaphysics</I>","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819142.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) says that everything has a reason that fully explains it. Leibniz expresses the PSR in Latin and French, respectively, as the principle that everything has a ratio or raison. When German philosophers of the eighteenth century, heavily influenced by the Leibnizian writings available to them, formulated similar ideas in their native tongue, they translated ratio as Grund and expressed the PSR accordingly as: Everything has a ground that fully explains it. This Principle of Sufficient Ground (Satz des zureichenden Grundes) or PSG is, so to speak, the Leibnizian PSR translated into German. The PSG – how to correctly formulate it, whether it holds without restriction – became one of the major topics of debate within the Leibnizian tradition of late eighteenth-century German philosophy, commonly known as German rationalism. It comes as no surprise then that Kant, steeped as he was in German rationalism and its debates, would extensively discuss the PSG and the notion of ground (Grund) in the metaphysics lectures he gave virtually every semester at the University of Königsberg from 1755 until his retirement from teaching in 1796. Nearly every extant transcript of those lectures contains extended discussions of the correct definition of “ground,” critical comments on the views of his near contemporaries (especially those of Wolff, Baumgarten and Crusius) about what grounds are, distinctions among different kinds of ground and considerations about the correct formulation and range of application of the PSG. While scholars have extensively discussed Kant’s treatment of the PSG in the Antinomies chapter of the Critique of Pure Reason, and, more
《康德形而上学讲稿的基础导论》
充分理由原则(PSR)认为,任何事物都有一个充分解释它的理由。莱布尼茨分别用拉丁语和法语将PSR表达为万物都有比例或理由的原则。18世纪的德国哲学家深受莱布尼茨著作的影响,用母语表达了类似的观点,他们将比率翻译为Grund,并相应地将PSR表达为:一切事物都有一个充分解释它的基础。这个充足理由原则(Satz des zureichenden Grundes)或PSG,可以说,是莱布尼茨的PSR翻译成德语。PSG——如何正确地表述它,它是否不受限制——成为18世纪晚期德国哲学莱布尼兹传统(通常被称为德国理性主义)争论的主要话题之一。因此毫不奇怪,康德沉浸在德国理性主义及其争论中,从1755年到1796年退休,他几乎每个学期都会在Königsberg大学的形而上学讲座中广泛讨论PSG和基础(Grund)的概念。几乎每一份现存的讲稿都包含了对“根据”的正确定义的扩展讨论,对他的同时代人(尤其是沃尔夫、鲍姆加滕和克鲁修斯)关于什么是根据的观点的批判性评论,不同种类的根据之间的区别,以及对PSG的正确表述和应用范围的考虑。虽然学者们在《纯粹理性批判》的二律背反章节中广泛讨论了康德对PSG的处理,等等
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信