LEARNING TO WRITE TEXT OF PERSUATION USING THE CIRCUIT LEARNING METHOD IN VIII MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS

Mallma Fatimah Al Tanjung, I. Mustika, T. Sobari
{"title":"LEARNING TO WRITE TEXT OF PERSUATION USING THE CIRCUIT LEARNING METHOD IN VIII MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS","authors":"Mallma Fatimah Al Tanjung, I. Mustika, T. Sobari","doi":"10.22460/jler.v4i2.6525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is an important activity for students to hone memory and perfect in learning activities and as a measurement tool for students who are creative in learning to write, especially persuasion texts. The purpose of this study 1). The activity of writing persuasive texts of the students before and after using the Circuit Learning method. 2) Knowing the student's performance when completing assignments to measure the ability to write persuasion texts. The author uses a population of class VIII junior high school students with a sample of 27 students. The research design used was a quasi-experimental method and the data technique used a pre-test and a final test. Tests in the form of tests of knowledge and skills test to write persuasion texts before and after using the Circuit Learning method. Based on the analysis and discussion, there are results of 1) Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) has a value of 0.000 <0.05, so it can be accepted that it is accepted, meaning that there is a difference between the results of writing the persuasive text for the pretest and posttest so that it can state that \"there is an effect of using the Circuit Learning method on learning outcomes in writing persuasive texts. 2) an increase in student performance improvement on the results written persuasion text, evidenced by the difficulty aspect in the pretest, namely the content suitability aspect of 17.14% (difficult), the language principle aspect of 21.43% (difficult), and the proportion at posttest, namely content suitability aspects 75.71% (easy) and aspects of language principles 34.54% (moderate).","PeriodicalId":319465,"journal":{"name":"JLER (Journal of Language Education Research)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JLER (Journal of Language Education Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/jler.v4i2.6525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing is an important activity for students to hone memory and perfect in learning activities and as a measurement tool for students who are creative in learning to write, especially persuasion texts. The purpose of this study 1). The activity of writing persuasive texts of the students before and after using the Circuit Learning method. 2) Knowing the student's performance when completing assignments to measure the ability to write persuasion texts. The author uses a population of class VIII junior high school students with a sample of 27 students. The research design used was a quasi-experimental method and the data technique used a pre-test and a final test. Tests in the form of tests of knowledge and skills test to write persuasion texts before and after using the Circuit Learning method. Based on the analysis and discussion, there are results of 1) Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) has a value of 0.000 <0.05, so it can be accepted that it is accepted, meaning that there is a difference between the results of writing the persuasive text for the pretest and posttest so that it can state that "there is an effect of using the Circuit Learning method on learning outcomes in writing persuasive texts. 2) an increase in student performance improvement on the results written persuasion text, evidenced by the difficulty aspect in the pretest, namely the content suitability aspect of 17.14% (difficult), the language principle aspect of 21.43% (difficult), and the proportion at posttest, namely content suitability aspects 75.71% (easy) and aspects of language principles 34.54% (moderate).
运用循环学习法学习初中生说服性课文的写作
写作是学生在学习活动中磨练记忆和完善的重要活动,是学生创造性学习写作尤其是说服文本的衡量工具。本研究的目的:1)学生在使用循环学习法前后的说服性文本写作活动。2)了解学生在完成作业时的表现,以衡量学生写说服文本的能力。本文以初八班学生为样本,共27名学生。研究设计采用准实验方法,数据技术采用预试和终试。考试形式以知识测试和技能测试的形式,在写说服文本前后采用循环学习法。通过分析和讨论,得到了1)渐进sig的结果。(2-tailed)的值为0.000 <0.05,因此可以接受,即写作说服性文本的前测和后测结果存在差异,从而可以说明“在写作说服性文本时,使用回路学习方法对学习结果有影响”。2)学生对结果书面说服文本的成绩提高有所增加,表现在前测难度方面,即内容适宜性方面为17.14%(难),语言原则方面为21.43%(难),后测比例为内容适宜性方面为75.71%(容易),语言原则方面为34.54%(中等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书