A Tale of Two States, An Analysis of Yemen’s Civil War

Sahand E. P. Faez
{"title":"A Tale of Two States, An Analysis of Yemen’s Civil War","authors":"Sahand E. P. Faez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3881530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of peace for the Yemen civil war. This war which is considered to be the worst humanitarian crisis of century erupted in 2014 when Houthi forces seized Sana’a after a short confrontation with the Hadi government. Later on, many foreign forces such as Saudi Arabia and Iran joined the two sides, turning it into a proxy war. The fighting is still going on today and no end seems to be in sight. In order to do the study, first the conflict in Yemen is analyzed. Using several resources from Farsi, Arabic and English media and by applying discourse analysis, this study shows that this war has been a lose-lose-lose game so far. Everybody lost; the Houthis, the Hadi government and the people. afterwards, by applying the logic of game theory and contract theory, this study shows that peace is the Pareto-Nash solution for the main two sides. It, however, is not the optimum solution for the foreign intervenors; since they are already benefiting from the war. Moreover, based on contract theory it is shown that this peace can only be achieved if a neutral yet influential power broker comes in.","PeriodicalId":322168,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior & Game Theory eJournal","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior & Game Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of peace for the Yemen civil war. This war which is considered to be the worst humanitarian crisis of century erupted in 2014 when Houthi forces seized Sana’a after a short confrontation with the Hadi government. Later on, many foreign forces such as Saudi Arabia and Iran joined the two sides, turning it into a proxy war. The fighting is still going on today and no end seems to be in sight. In order to do the study, first the conflict in Yemen is analyzed. Using several resources from Farsi, Arabic and English media and by applying discourse analysis, this study shows that this war has been a lose-lose-lose game so far. Everybody lost; the Houthis, the Hadi government and the people. afterwards, by applying the logic of game theory and contract theory, this study shows that peace is the Pareto-Nash solution for the main two sides. It, however, is not the optimum solution for the foreign intervenors; since they are already benefiting from the war. Moreover, based on contract theory it is shown that this peace can only be achieved if a neutral yet influential power broker comes in.
《两个国家的故事:也门内战分析》
本研究的目的是探讨也门内战和平的可行性。这场被认为是本世纪最严重的人道主义危机的战争于2014年爆发,当时胡塞武装在与哈迪政府短暂对峙后占领了萨那。后来,沙特阿拉伯和伊朗等许多外国势力加入了双方,使其成为一场代理人战争。战斗今天仍在继续,似乎看不到结束的迹象。为了进行研究,首先对也门的冲突进行分析。本研究利用波斯语、阿拉伯语和英语媒体的多种资源,并运用话语分析,表明这场战争到目前为止是一场双输的游戏。每个人都失去了;胡塞武装、哈迪政府和人民。然后,运用博弈论和契约理论的逻辑,证明了和平是主要双方的帕累托-纳什解。然而,这并不是外国干预者的最佳解决方案;因为他们已经从战争中受益了。此外,根据契约理论,这种和平只有在中立但有影响力的权力经纪人介入的情况下才能实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信