Relics of Pagan Antiquity in Mediæval Settings

W. S. Heckscher
{"title":"Relics of Pagan Antiquity in Mediæval Settings","authors":"W. S. Heckscher","doi":"10.2307/750006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he most obvious examples of relics of Antiquity in mediaeval setting are the ancient gems and precious stones which, in spite of their pagan carvings, were used by mediaeval craftsmen for the decoration of covers of prayer-books, croziers, crosses, relic-shrines and other ecclesiastical objects; not to mention the personal seals and signet-rings of the highest dignitaries of the Church. Although the importance of the subject has frequently been stressed,x it has remained a sort of 'no man's land' between the fields of Classical Archaeology and Mediaeval History of Art. There exists, to my knowledge, no serious attempt to interpret this significant chapter of mediaeval aesthetics, which incidentally has some important bearing on the psychology of mediaeval tolerance ; for in studying the use of ancient stones in mediaeval jewellery it becomes apparent that orthodox Christianity and pagan Antiquity lived here in peaceful symbiosis. To relate this event to its general background it will be necessary first to describe in what terms mediaeval Christianity conceived of its own relation to antiquity and what general rules it consequently observed (if any) in the treatment of pagan relics. Secondly, we shall examine the particular concepts of beauty, which dictated or permitted the mediaeval appreciation of ancient gems. In the third place, we shall mention the elements of magic and superstition which entered into this appreciation. And finally, we shall give a number of detailed illustrations, which will show the process by which individual remains of pagan antiquity were incorporated in Christian settings. In dealing with the first three points it will be neither possible nor desirable to avoid reference to well-known facts and repetition of well-established theories. My indebtedness to the schools of Warburg and Konrad Burdach will be obvious-so much so, that it seems unnecessary to refer to them in every single instance.","PeriodicalId":410128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1938-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/750006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

T he most obvious examples of relics of Antiquity in mediaeval setting are the ancient gems and precious stones which, in spite of their pagan carvings, were used by mediaeval craftsmen for the decoration of covers of prayer-books, croziers, crosses, relic-shrines and other ecclesiastical objects; not to mention the personal seals and signet-rings of the highest dignitaries of the Church. Although the importance of the subject has frequently been stressed,x it has remained a sort of 'no man's land' between the fields of Classical Archaeology and Mediaeval History of Art. There exists, to my knowledge, no serious attempt to interpret this significant chapter of mediaeval aesthetics, which incidentally has some important bearing on the psychology of mediaeval tolerance ; for in studying the use of ancient stones in mediaeval jewellery it becomes apparent that orthodox Christianity and pagan Antiquity lived here in peaceful symbiosis. To relate this event to its general background it will be necessary first to describe in what terms mediaeval Christianity conceived of its own relation to antiquity and what general rules it consequently observed (if any) in the treatment of pagan relics. Secondly, we shall examine the particular concepts of beauty, which dictated or permitted the mediaeval appreciation of ancient gems. In the third place, we shall mention the elements of magic and superstition which entered into this appreciation. And finally, we shall give a number of detailed illustrations, which will show the process by which individual remains of pagan antiquity were incorporated in Christian settings. In dealing with the first three points it will be neither possible nor desirable to avoid reference to well-known facts and repetition of well-established theories. My indebtedness to the schools of Warburg and Konrad Burdach will be obvious-so much so, that it seems unnecessary to refer to them in every single instance.
中世纪的异教徒遗迹
古代文物在中世纪的最明显的例子是古代的宝石和宝石,尽管它们是异教徒的雕刻,但它们被中世纪的工匠用来装饰祈祷书的封面、十字架、圣坛和其他宗教物品;更不用说教会最高政要的私人印章和图章戒指了。虽然这门学科的重要性经常被强调,但它仍然是古典考古学和中世纪艺术史领域之间的“无人区”。据我所知,没有人认真地试图解释中世纪美学的这一重要章节,而这一章节恰好与中世纪的宽容心理有一些重要的关系;因为在研究古代宝石在中世纪珠宝中的使用时,很明显,正统基督教和异教古代在这里和平共处。为了把这一事件与它的一般背景联系起来,首先有必要描述一下中世纪基督教是用什么术语来理解它与古代的关系的,以及它因此在处理异教徒遗物时遵守了什么一般规则(如果有的话)。其次,我们将研究特定的美的概念,这些概念决定或允许中世纪对古代宝石的欣赏。第三,我们要提到在这种欣赏中所包含的魔法和迷信的因素。最后,我们将给出一些详细的插图,这些插图将展示异教徒古代遗迹被纳入基督教背景的过程。在讨论前三点时,既不可能也不可取避免提及众所周知的事实和重复已确立的理论。我对华宝学派和康拉德·布尔达克学派的感激之情是显而易见的——如此之多,以至于似乎没有必要在每一个例子中都提到他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信