Polycrisis and the Sustainable Democracy: Focusing on the effectiveness and the efficacy of Democracy

Wonyoung Lee
{"title":"Polycrisis and the Sustainable Democracy: Focusing on the effectiveness and the efficacy of Democracy","authors":"Wonyoung Lee","doi":"10.35225/kdps.2023.18.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, the world faces the ‘Polycrisis’ which may be called as the systemic risk. The climate crisis, the geo-political crisis, and the risk of the stagflation etc., which are universe not to be limited to the specific country but to impact to all the countries which exist in the global system. However, all the countries have the accumulated but not-solved problems in accordance with their social condition in them. Those can be appeared as the special crisis combined with the global polycrisis. In Korea, there are the most critical three problems. One is the inequality problem which makes the political, economical and social polarization more serious since the financial crisis in 1997. The other is the population extinction, which leads the province extinction and the hyper-aging society. Those problems combined with the global polycrisis, construct the Korean special crisis. But the populistic political trend, which is the last critical problem, makes the Korean special crisis more difficult to overcome. The populistic political trend only focuses on the political attack to the rival party for the political interest. And what is worse, they attack the rival party even with the fake news. Some of those crises result from the Neo-Liberalism paradigm. Or Neo-Liberal paradigm exacerbates some of those crises. Thus to overcome the crises, at first, we need the transition from the Neo-Liberal paradigm. And if we do not overcome through the effectiveness and the efficacy of democracy, the threat to the democracy itself like the emergence of populism will be strenthened. The direction to overcome the crises coincides with the accomplishment of SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) which was resolved at UN General Assembly in 2015. Therefore, we need the ‘Sustainable Democracy’ paradigm as the new paradigm to overcome the crises and for the sustainability of the democracy.","PeriodicalId":197275,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of NGO Studies (KANGOS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of NGO Studies (KANGOS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35225/kdps.2023.18.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, the world faces the ‘Polycrisis’ which may be called as the systemic risk. The climate crisis, the geo-political crisis, and the risk of the stagflation etc., which are universe not to be limited to the specific country but to impact to all the countries which exist in the global system. However, all the countries have the accumulated but not-solved problems in accordance with their social condition in them. Those can be appeared as the special crisis combined with the global polycrisis. In Korea, there are the most critical three problems. One is the inequality problem which makes the political, economical and social polarization more serious since the financial crisis in 1997. The other is the population extinction, which leads the province extinction and the hyper-aging society. Those problems combined with the global polycrisis, construct the Korean special crisis. But the populistic political trend, which is the last critical problem, makes the Korean special crisis more difficult to overcome. The populistic political trend only focuses on the political attack to the rival party for the political interest. And what is worse, they attack the rival party even with the fake news. Some of those crises result from the Neo-Liberalism paradigm. Or Neo-Liberal paradigm exacerbates some of those crises. Thus to overcome the crises, at first, we need the transition from the Neo-Liberal paradigm. And if we do not overcome through the effectiveness and the efficacy of democracy, the threat to the democracy itself like the emergence of populism will be strenthened. The direction to overcome the crises coincides with the accomplishment of SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) which was resolved at UN General Assembly in 2015. Therefore, we need the ‘Sustainable Democracy’ paradigm as the new paradigm to overcome the crises and for the sustainability of the democracy.
多元危机与可持续民主:关注民主的有效性和效能
当今世界面临着“多重危机”,即系统性风险。气候危机,地缘政治危机,滞胀风险等,这些都不局限于特定的国家,而是影响到全球体系中存在的所有国家。但是,各国都存在着根据本国社会条件积累而未解决的问题。这可以表现为特殊危机与全球性多重危机的结合。在韩国,有三个最关键的问题。一是1997年金融危机以来,不平等问题使得政治、经济和社会的两极分化更加严重。二是人口灭绝,导致省灭绝和超老龄化社会。这些问题与全球性的多重危机相结合,构成了韩国的特殊危机。但是,作为最后一个关键问题的民粹主义政治倾向,使韩国的特殊危机更加难以克服。民粹主义政治倾向只注重为了政治利益而对对手政党进行政治攻击。更糟糕的是,他们甚至用假新闻攻击对手。其中一些危机源于新自由主义范式。或者新自由主义范式加剧了其中的一些危机。因此,为了克服危机,首先,我们需要从新自由主义范式过渡。如果不通过民主主义的有效性和效力来克服,民粹主义的出现等对民主主义本身的威胁就会加强。克服危机的方向与2015年联合国大会决议的可持续发展目标(SDGs)的实现相一致。因此,我们需要“可持续民主”范式作为克服危机和民主可持续性的新范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信