Equal Treatment of Mobile Persons in the Context of a Social Market Economy

C. Jacqueson, F. Pennings
{"title":"Equal Treatment of Mobile Persons in the Context of a Social Market Economy","authors":"C. Jacqueson, F. Pennings","doi":"10.18352/ulr.511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free movement of persons is a fundamental freedom and equal treatment its necessary corollary. Yet, both principles have come under pressure in the past decades. This article investigates three forms of mobility within the European Union (EU): workers, economically inactive persons and posted workers. In respect of all three categories, there is a tension between social and market interests, which appears most clearly when comparing their right of equal treatment. The balancing between market and social values is at the core of this research. We expect that the social market economy will, on the one hand, explain the ‘why’ in discussing the right of equal treatment of free movers and its limitations. On the other hand, the social market economy also has a normative dimension, which enables us to discuss perspectives on how equal treatment can develop, and make some propositions. We argue that the social component in the market economy requires a revision of what is seen as fair competition in the direction of outlawing social dumping. We also find that the persistence of the market elements pleads for the right to free movement of persons, which does not substantially disturb the economy of the host Member State.","PeriodicalId":399000,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Migration (Topic)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Migration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Free movement of persons is a fundamental freedom and equal treatment its necessary corollary. Yet, both principles have come under pressure in the past decades. This article investigates three forms of mobility within the European Union (EU): workers, economically inactive persons and posted workers. In respect of all three categories, there is a tension between social and market interests, which appears most clearly when comparing their right of equal treatment. The balancing between market and social values is at the core of this research. We expect that the social market economy will, on the one hand, explain the ‘why’ in discussing the right of equal treatment of free movers and its limitations. On the other hand, the social market economy also has a normative dimension, which enables us to discuss perspectives on how equal treatment can develop, and make some propositions. We argue that the social component in the market economy requires a revision of what is seen as fair competition in the direction of outlawing social dumping. We also find that the persistence of the market elements pleads for the right to free movement of persons, which does not substantially disturb the economy of the host Member State.
社会市场经济条件下流动人口的平等待遇
人员自由流动是一项基本自由,平等待遇是其必然结果。然而,在过去的几十年里,这两个原则都受到了压力。本文调查了欧盟(EU)内部的三种流动形式:工人、非经济活动人员和外派工人。就所有这三类而言,社会利益和市场利益之间存在紧张关系,这在比较它们的平等待遇权利时表现得最为明显。市场价值与社会价值的平衡是本研究的核心。一方面,我们期待社会市场经济在讨论平等对待自由流动者的权利及其局限性时,能够解释“为什么”。另一方面,社会市场经济也有规范的维度,这使我们能够讨论平等待遇如何发展的观点,并提出一些主张。我们认为,市场经济中的社会组成部分需要在禁止社会倾销的方向上对公平竞争进行修订。我们还发现,市场因素的持续存在要求人们有自由流动的权利,而这种自由流动不会对东道国的经济造成实质性的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信