Science Research and the History of Science

Ona Voverienė
{"title":"Science Research and the History of Science","authors":"Ona Voverienė","doi":"10.3846/EST.2009.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the theory of science research, (the philosophy of science) and analyses relations among different branches of science. It is accepted, that science research and the history of different branches of sciences are the nearest neighbours because some of their methods of investigations are used in several branches of science. Besides, the analysis of some particular questions of science research reveals its historical development as an independent field of science. Science research does differ from the history of science because every branch of science is made of constituents including theory (philosophy), methodology, history and practise. The history of science research stands at the same level as the history of physics, the history of chemistry and the history of mathematics. Another difference in quality between the history of science research and the history of some other branches of science is the goals established by these subjects; the history of particular brances of science strives for answering the question what happened during the exact period of developing that science and what conditions and methods of research had a singnificant impact on the events and achieved results. Science research seeks for establishing the present situation of scientific research and the ways of optimizing them. \"The author of the article recommends to start a new programme with researching the history of science and analyzing the created works of the scientists of the previous generations. Moreover, the author produces recommendations on how to improve the growth of scientific research. Article in Lithuanian","PeriodicalId":110614,"journal":{"name":"Mokslo Ir Technikos Raida","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mokslo Ir Technikos Raida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/EST.2009.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on the theory of science research, (the philosophy of science) and analyses relations among different branches of science. It is accepted, that science research and the history of different branches of sciences are the nearest neighbours because some of their methods of investigations are used in several branches of science. Besides, the analysis of some particular questions of science research reveals its historical development as an independent field of science. Science research does differ from the history of science because every branch of science is made of constituents including theory (philosophy), methodology, history and practise. The history of science research stands at the same level as the history of physics, the history of chemistry and the history of mathematics. Another difference in quality between the history of science research and the history of some other branches of science is the goals established by these subjects; the history of particular brances of science strives for answering the question what happened during the exact period of developing that science and what conditions and methods of research had a singnificant impact on the events and achieved results. Science research seeks for establishing the present situation of scientific research and the ways of optimizing them. "The author of the article recommends to start a new programme with researching the history of science and analyzing the created works of the scientists of the previous generations. Moreover, the author produces recommendations on how to improve the growth of scientific research. Article in Lithuanian
科学研究与科学史
本文从科学研究的理论(科学哲学)出发,分析了不同科学分支之间的关系。人们普遍认为,科学研究和不同科学分支的历史是最密切的邻居,因为它们的一些研究方法被用于多个科学分支。此外,通过对科学研究中一些具体问题的分析,揭示了科学研究作为一个独立的科学领域的历史发展。科学研究确实不同于科学史,因为科学的每一个分支都是由包括理论(哲学)、方法论、历史和实践在内的成分组成的。科学研究史与物理学史、化学史和数学史处于同一水平。科学研究史与其他一些科学分支的历史在性质上的另一个区别是这些学科所确立的目标;特定科学分支的历史力求回答这样的问题:在该科学发展的确切时期发生了什么,什么样的研究条件和方法对这些事件产生了重大影响并取得了成果。科学研究的目的在于确立科学研究的现状和优化现状的途径。这篇文章的作者建议开始一个新的项目,研究科学史,分析前人的创造。此外,作者还就如何促进科研发展提出了建议。文章(立陶宛文)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书