“Utility of Cancer ratio (serum LDH: pleural fluid ADA) for predicting malignancy in patients with exudative pleural effusion” .

Bhaskar Kakarla, Varaprasad Kuruva, S. Deme, Sekhar Babu, Banda, N. Narahari, Paramjyothy Gongati Kruparao
{"title":"“Utility of Cancer ratio (serum LDH: pleural fluid ADA) for predicting malignancy in patients with exudative pleural effusion” .","authors":"Bhaskar Kakarla, Varaprasad Kuruva, S. Deme, Sekhar Babu, Banda, N. Narahari, Paramjyothy Gongati Kruparao","doi":"10.22038/JCTM.2021.55782.1317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Pleural effusion is an accumulation of fluid in the pleural space. It can be transudative or exudative. Mechanisms like alteration in Starling’s forces lead to transudative effusions while inflammation and infiltration by infections, malignancy, connective tissue diseases, etc lead to exudative effusions. Nearly 40% of patients with malignancy have pleural effusion at the time of presentation. Bronchogenic carcinoma, carcinoma of the breast, lymphoma are the leading causes of malignant pleural effusion(MPE) followed by gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynecological causes. Pleural fluid Adenosine DeAminase(ADA) has good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for tuberculosis whereas pleural fluid cytology /biopsy are the main diagnostic modalities for MPE. However pleural fluid cytology is positive in only 48.5% of cases in the first sample but the yield increases with repeated analysis or other more invasive investigations like blind pleural biopsy/thoracoscopy. In cases with negative pleural fluid cytology, a biochemical marker known as Cancer ratio i.e serum LDH and pleural fluid ADA can be useful in predicting malignant causes. A cancer ratio cutoff of more than 20 helps in guiding the physician for further workups like FDG PET or tumor markers in evaluating malignancies. With this background our study aimed at the usefulness of cancer ratio in patients with exudative pleural effusion.Materials and Methods: It's a prospective observational study done for a period of 18months.100 adult patients with exudative pleural effusions were recruited. Serum LDH, pleural fluid ADA was done in all cases and the cancer ratio is validated for diagnosis of malignant effusions. Results: The mean age of patients was 55.48±9.32 years. There were 57 malignant and 43 nonmalignant cases. Bronchogenic carcinoma was the leading cause of MPE and tuberculosis was the commonest cause of non-malignant pleural effusions. Mean serum LDH, Pleural fluid ADA, and cancer ratio in malignant cases and nonmalignant cases was 434.54 and 350.04IU/ml,19.05 and 32.97IU/ml and 25.13, 20.45 respectively. The sensitivity of cancer ratio was 70.17%, specificity was 76.74%.Conclusions: Cancer ratio is an easy and valid diagnostic tool in suspecting malignant pleural effusions with good sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":131413,"journal":{"name":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JCTM.2021.55782.1317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Pleural effusion is an accumulation of fluid in the pleural space. It can be transudative or exudative. Mechanisms like alteration in Starling’s forces lead to transudative effusions while inflammation and infiltration by infections, malignancy, connective tissue diseases, etc lead to exudative effusions. Nearly 40% of patients with malignancy have pleural effusion at the time of presentation. Bronchogenic carcinoma, carcinoma of the breast, lymphoma are the leading causes of malignant pleural effusion(MPE) followed by gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynecological causes. Pleural fluid Adenosine DeAminase(ADA) has good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for tuberculosis whereas pleural fluid cytology /biopsy are the main diagnostic modalities for MPE. However pleural fluid cytology is positive in only 48.5% of cases in the first sample but the yield increases with repeated analysis or other more invasive investigations like blind pleural biopsy/thoracoscopy. In cases with negative pleural fluid cytology, a biochemical marker known as Cancer ratio i.e serum LDH and pleural fluid ADA can be useful in predicting malignant causes. A cancer ratio cutoff of more than 20 helps in guiding the physician for further workups like FDG PET or tumor markers in evaluating malignancies. With this background our study aimed at the usefulness of cancer ratio in patients with exudative pleural effusion.Materials and Methods: It's a prospective observational study done for a period of 18months.100 adult patients with exudative pleural effusions were recruited. Serum LDH, pleural fluid ADA was done in all cases and the cancer ratio is validated for diagnosis of malignant effusions. Results: The mean age of patients was 55.48±9.32 years. There were 57 malignant and 43 nonmalignant cases. Bronchogenic carcinoma was the leading cause of MPE and tuberculosis was the commonest cause of non-malignant pleural effusions. Mean serum LDH, Pleural fluid ADA, and cancer ratio in malignant cases and nonmalignant cases was 434.54 and 350.04IU/ml,19.05 and 32.97IU/ml and 25.13, 20.45 respectively. The sensitivity of cancer ratio was 70.17%, specificity was 76.74%.Conclusions: Cancer ratio is an easy and valid diagnostic tool in suspecting malignant pleural effusions with good sensitivity and specificity.
“肿瘤比值(血清LDH:胸腔液ADA)预测渗出性胸腔积液患者恶性肿瘤的效用”。
简介:胸腔积液是一种积液在胸腔内的表现。它可以是分泌性的或渗出性的。诸如斯特林氏力改变等机制导致渗出性积液,而炎症和感染、恶性肿瘤、结缔组织疾病等浸润导致渗出性积液。近40%的恶性肿瘤患者在发病时有胸腔积液。支气管源性癌、乳腺癌、淋巴瘤是恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的主要原因,其次是胃肠道、泌尿生殖系统和妇科原因。胸膜液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)对肺结核有良好的诊断敏感性和特异性,而胸膜液细胞学/活检是MPE的主要诊断方式。然而,在第一次样本中,只有48.5%的病例胸膜液细胞学阳性,但随着重复分析或其他更具侵入性的检查(如盲胸膜活检/胸腔镜检查),这一比例会增加。在胸水细胞学阴性的病例中,一种生化标记物,即血清LDH和胸水ADA,可用于预测恶性病因。超过20的癌症比率临界值有助于指导医生进一步检查,如FDG PET或肿瘤标志物,以评估恶性肿瘤。在此背景下,我们的研究旨在探讨肿瘤比率在渗出性胸腔积液患者中的作用。材料和方法:这是一项为期18个月的前瞻性观察研究。我们招募了100例胸腔渗出性积液的成年患者。所有病例均行血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶(ADA)检测,并对恶性积液的诊断进行验证。结果:患者平均年龄55.48±9.32岁。恶性57例,非恶性43例。支气管源性癌是MPE的主要原因,而结核是非恶性胸腔积液的最常见原因。恶性组和非恶性组的平均血清LDH、胸水ADA和癌比分别为434.54、350.04IU/ml、19.05、32.97IU/ml和25.13、20.45。敏感性为70.17%,特异性为76.74%。结论:癌率是诊断恶性胸腔积液简便、有效的诊断工具,具有良好的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信