A Variação de Capacidades Burocráticas na Administração Pública Federal Brasileira: uma Análise com Dados de Survey

Alexandre de Ávila Gomide, Raphael Amorim Machado, Rafael da Silva Lins
{"title":"A Variação de Capacidades Burocráticas na Administração Pública Federal Brasileira: uma Análise com Dados de Survey","authors":"Alexandre de Ávila Gomide, Raphael Amorim Machado, Rafael da Silva Lins","doi":"10.1590/1984-92302022v29n0009pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to demonstrate the variation in bureaucratic capacities within the Brazilian Federal Public Administration concerning organizations belonging to different policy sectors and verify theoretical propositions in the literature about the relationship between the characteristics of public bureaucracy and state action. For such purposes, data from a questionnaire applied to Brazilian federal civil servants were analyzed using a set of multivariate analysis techniques. The findings indicate that organizations with a greater perception of bureaucratic \"weberianess\" are correlated with innovative organizations and organizational cultures that restrict corruption. Likewise, organizations with greater bureaucratic autonomy are associated with more effective organizations. However, the observed variation between perceived capabilities and performance did not characterize a clearly identifiable pattern of organization type with public policy sectors. In this sense, the article contributes to the literature by adding nuances to the \"islands of excellence\" approach by verifying that the asymmetry of capabilities within the Brazilian executive branch is more complex than indicated by previous research.","PeriodicalId":206469,"journal":{"name":"Organizações & Sociedade","volume":"87-88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizações & Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-92302022v29n0009pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to demonstrate the variation in bureaucratic capacities within the Brazilian Federal Public Administration concerning organizations belonging to different policy sectors and verify theoretical propositions in the literature about the relationship between the characteristics of public bureaucracy and state action. For such purposes, data from a questionnaire applied to Brazilian federal civil servants were analyzed using a set of multivariate analysis techniques. The findings indicate that organizations with a greater perception of bureaucratic "weberianess" are correlated with innovative organizations and organizational cultures that restrict corruption. Likewise, organizations with greater bureaucratic autonomy are associated with more effective organizations. However, the observed variation between perceived capabilities and performance did not characterize a clearly identifiable pattern of organization type with public policy sectors. In this sense, the article contributes to the literature by adding nuances to the "islands of excellence" approach by verifying that the asymmetry of capabilities within the Brazilian executive branch is more complex than indicated by previous research.
巴西联邦公共行政中官僚能力的变化:调查数据的分析
本文旨在展示巴西联邦公共行政部门内不同政策部门组织的官僚能力差异,并验证文献中关于公共官僚主义特征与国家行为之间关系的理论命题。为此目的,使用一套多变量分析技术对巴西联邦公务员的问卷数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,对官僚主义“韦伯性”感知程度较高的组织与创新组织和限制腐败的组织文化相关。同样,具有更大官僚自治的组织与更有效的组织联系在一起。然而,观察到的感知能力和绩效之间的差异并没有明确界定公共政策部门的组织类型模式。从这个意义上讲,本文通过验证巴西行政部门内部能力的不对称比以前的研究表明的更为复杂,为“卓越岛屿”方法增加了细微差别,从而对文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信