Nature and Roles of Popular Discontent in Institutional Dynamics from the Early to the Later Veblen

Andrea Pacella
{"title":"Nature and Roles of Popular Discontent in Institutional Dynamics from the Early to the Later Veblen","authors":"Andrea Pacella","doi":"10.38024/arpe.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work sets out to re-read Veblen on the nature and effect of popular opinion in the process of institutional evolution. We mainly want to show – contrary to much of the interpretative literature – that machine discipline is just one way, and not even the main one, that Veblen uses to explain how popular discontent is generated, and that the economic grounds underlying the process of modification of institutions can work only if it is free from any counteracting force and modification therefore does not necessarily derive from machine discipline. In these terms the technocratic reading of the role of the population in the process of institutional change is only partially convincing. In order to achieve this general goal we will show how and where Veblen actually deals with the question of popular discontent in his works and what role it plays.","PeriodicalId":252052,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Political Economy","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present work sets out to re-read Veblen on the nature and effect of popular opinion in the process of institutional evolution. We mainly want to show – contrary to much of the interpretative literature – that machine discipline is just one way, and not even the main one, that Veblen uses to explain how popular discontent is generated, and that the economic grounds underlying the process of modification of institutions can work only if it is free from any counteracting force and modification therefore does not necessarily derive from machine discipline. In these terms the technocratic reading of the role of the population in the process of institutional change is only partially convincing. In order to achieve this general goal we will show how and where Veblen actually deals with the question of popular discontent in his works and what role it plays.
从早期到后期,大众不满在制度动力学中的性质和作用
本文旨在重新解读凡勃伦关于制度演变过程中民意的性质和作用的观点。我们主要想表明——与许多解释性文献相反——机器纪律只是一种方式,甚至不是主要的方式,凡勃伦用来解释公众不满是如何产生的,制度修改过程背后的经济基础只有在没有任何对抗力量的情况下才能起作用,因此修改不一定来自机器纪律。在这些术语中,技术官僚对人口在制度变革过程中的作用的解读只能部分令人信服。为了达到这个总体目标,我们将展示凡勃伦在他的作品中是如何以及在哪里处理公众不满的问题,以及它扮演了什么角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信