{"title":"On the Possible Transformation and Vanishment of Epistemic Objects","authors":"H. Rheinberger","doi":"10.46938/tv.2016.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When considering the question of possible transformation and disappearance of scientific objects, it is useful to distinguish between epistemic and technical objects. This paper presents preliminary observations and offers a typology of obsolescence. It is based on several case studies drawn from the history of life sciences. The paper proceeds as follows: first, the dynamics of epistemic objects is considered through the examples of Carl Correns’ study of “xenia”, Alfred Kühn’s work on physiological developmental genetics, and Paul Zamecnik’s research on the protein biosynthesis. Second, the phasing out of technical objects is then separately discussed and illustrated by the example of radioactive tracing in biology – until recently, an established technique of visualization.","PeriodicalId":349992,"journal":{"name":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2016.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
When considering the question of possible transformation and disappearance of scientific objects, it is useful to distinguish between epistemic and technical objects. This paper presents preliminary observations and offers a typology of obsolescence. It is based on several case studies drawn from the history of life sciences. The paper proceeds as follows: first, the dynamics of epistemic objects is considered through the examples of Carl Correns’ study of “xenia”, Alfred Kühn’s work on physiological developmental genetics, and Paul Zamecnik’s research on the protein biosynthesis. Second, the phasing out of technical objects is then separately discussed and illustrated by the example of radioactive tracing in biology – until recently, an established technique of visualization.
在考虑科学对象可能的转化和消失的问题时,区分认识对象和技术对象是有用的。本文提出了初步的观察结果,并提供了一个过时的类型学。它是基于生命科学史上的几个案例研究。本文首先以Carl Correns对“xenia”的研究、Alfred k (hn)对生理发育遗传学的研究、Paul Zamecnik对蛋白质生物合成的研究为例,对认知对象的动力学进行了探讨。其次,对技术对象的逐步淘汰进行了单独讨论,并以生物学中的放射性示踪为例进行了说明——直到最近,这还是一种成熟的可视化技术。