K. Kumarasinghe
{"title":"Making Sense and Locating Emotions in Social Sciences: A Conversation with Margrit Pernau","authors":"K. Kumarasinghe","doi":"10.1177/2393861720929186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Margrit Pernau is with the Center for the History of Emotions at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin. She is a pioneer in the study of emotions. Among her publications are Emotions and Modernity in Colonial India: From Balance to Fervor (2019) and Ashraf into Middle Classes: Muslims in Nineteenth-Century Delhi (2013). In 2018, she co-edited Monsoon Feelings: A History of Emotions in the Rain with Imke Rajamani and Katherine Butler Schofield. On 6 March 2020, she delivered a lecture titled, ‘A History of Emotions in India: A Critical Introduction’ at the Department of Sociology, South Asian University, New Delhi. She was interviewed in New Delhi subsequent to this lecture. Kaushalya Kumarasinghe: Whenever we refer to emotions in academia, there is a risk or chance of falling into the premise of psychology or maybe moral philosophy. Since post-enlightenment disciplinary markers are still quite prominent, one should at least anticipate such consequences. Therefore, how do we understand emotions sociologically or anthropologically? Margrit Pernau: There are, of course, many different ways of approaching the study of emotions, depending on the research questions you want to ask. My own approach (laid out in an article co-written with Imke Rajamani) draws on phenomenology and the history of concepts. We take the experience of the actors as our starting point: Society and Culture in South Asia 6(2) 328–334, 2020 © 2020 South Asian University Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journalspermissions-india DOI: 10.1177/2393861720929186 journals.sagepub.com/home/scs","PeriodicalId":158055,"journal":{"name":"Society and Culture in South Asia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Culture in South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861720929186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
在社会科学中理解和定位情感:与玛格丽特·佩诺的对话
玛格丽特·佩诺(Margrit Pernau)就职于柏林马克斯·普朗克人类发展研究所情感历史中心。她是研究情感的先驱。她的著作包括《殖民印度的情感与现代性:从平衡到热情》(2019)和《阿什拉夫进入中产阶级:19世纪德里的穆斯林》(2013)。2018年,她与伊姆克·拉贾马尼和凯瑟琳·巴特勒·斯科菲尔德合编了《季风情感:雨中的情感史》。2020年3月6日,她在新德里南亚大学社会学系发表了题为“印度情感史:批判性介绍”的演讲。讲座结束后,她在新德里接受了采访。考沙利亚·鸠摩罗辛格:每当我们在学术界提到情感时,就有可能陷入心理学或道德哲学的前提。既然后启蒙时代的学科标记仍然相当突出,我们至少应该预料到这样的后果。因此,我们如何从社会学或人类学的角度理解情感?Margrit Pernau:当然,有很多不同的方法来研究情绪,这取决于你想问的研究问题。我自己的方法(在与Imke Rajamani合著的一篇文章中提出)借鉴了现象学和概念史。我们以演员的经验为出发点:南亚社会与文化6(2)328-334,2020©2020南亚大学转载及许可:in.sagepub.com/journalspermissions-india DOI: 10.1177/2393861720929186 journals.sagepub.com/home/scs
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。