Development and Validation of the Brief Unhelpful Thoughts Scale (BUTs)

S. Knowles, P. Apputhurai, G. Bates
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Brief Unhelpful Thoughts Scale (BUTs)","authors":"S. Knowles, P. Apputhurai, G. Bates","doi":"10.12974/2313-1047.2017.04.02.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key component of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is to identify and challenge unhelpful thinking patterns (also known as cognitive distortions, thinking errors, or distorted automatic negative thoughts) in interventions that foster more reality-oriented thinking. This paper describes the development and validation of the Brief Unhelpful Thinking Scale (BUTs). Four studies were conducted of which three included mixed undergraduate and community samples (Studies 1-3) and one was a clinical sample of individuals diagnosed with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). An 11-item two-factor model of unhelpful thinking emerged in Study 1(N=223), which was confirmed in Study 2(N=203). The first factor focused on negative self-bias (e.g., generalized, negative, emotional), and the second factor focused on expectations of others (e.g., expectations others will act fairly, change, follow rules). Study 3 (N=23) established test-retest reliability for the BUTs and the final study (N=9) examined BUTs in a group-based CBT intervention for SAD. This study showed the BUTs to be sensitive to changes in unhelpful thinking after a CBT intervention.\nConclusion: In conclusion, the BUTs is a brief psychometrically valid measure of unhelpful thinking that can be utilized by both clinicians and researchers who wish to measure individual unhelpful thinking patterns and relate them to changes in psychological distress in CBT-based interventions. ","PeriodicalId":222355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2313-1047.2017.04.02.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key component of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is to identify and challenge unhelpful thinking patterns (also known as cognitive distortions, thinking errors, or distorted automatic negative thoughts) in interventions that foster more reality-oriented thinking. This paper describes the development and validation of the Brief Unhelpful Thinking Scale (BUTs). Four studies were conducted of which three included mixed undergraduate and community samples (Studies 1-3) and one was a clinical sample of individuals diagnosed with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). An 11-item two-factor model of unhelpful thinking emerged in Study 1(N=223), which was confirmed in Study 2(N=203). The first factor focused on negative self-bias (e.g., generalized, negative, emotional), and the second factor focused on expectations of others (e.g., expectations others will act fairly, change, follow rules). Study 3 (N=23) established test-retest reliability for the BUTs and the final study (N=9) examined BUTs in a group-based CBT intervention for SAD. This study showed the BUTs to be sensitive to changes in unhelpful thinking after a CBT intervention. Conclusion: In conclusion, the BUTs is a brief psychometrically valid measure of unhelpful thinking that can be utilized by both clinicians and researchers who wish to measure individual unhelpful thinking patterns and relate them to changes in psychological distress in CBT-based interventions. 
简易无益思想量表的编制与验证
认知行为疗法(CBT)的一个关键组成部分是在干预中识别和挑战无益的思维模式(也称为认知扭曲、思维错误或扭曲的自动消极思维),以培养更多面向现实的思维。本文介绍了简略无益思维量表(BUTs)的开发与验证。共进行了四项研究,其中三项包括混合的大学生和社区样本(研究1-3),另一项是诊断为社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的个体的临床样本。在研究1(N=223)中出现了一个11项的双因素模型,在研究2(N=203)中得到了证实。第一个因素侧重于消极的自我偏见(例如,普遍化的、消极的、情绪化的),第二个因素侧重于对他人的期望(例如,期望他人会公平行事、改变、遵守规则)。研究3 (N=23)建立了BUTs的重测信度,最后一项研究(N=9)检验了BUTs在基于组的CBT干预SAD中的作用。这项研究表明,在接受CBT干预后,BUTs对无用思维的变化很敏感。结论:综上所述,BUTs是一种简单有效的无益思维的心理测量方法,临床医生和研究人员都可以使用它来测量个体的无益思维模式,并将其与基于cbt的干预措施中心理困扰的变化联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信