Linking Adverbials in Indonesian EFL Students’ Essays: A Corpus-Driven Study

Ikmi Nur Oktavianti, Japen Sarage
{"title":"Linking Adverbials in Indonesian EFL Students’ Essays: A Corpus-Driven Study","authors":"Ikmi Nur Oktavianti, Japen Sarage","doi":"10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is the activity of arranging and organizing ideas that need some logical connectors to make the ideas cohesively structured. There are several plausible means for cohesiveness, including linking adverbials (LAs). This study examines the LA categories found in EFL students’ academic essays and explores how EL students use them. The data were collected from students’ essays compiled as a learner corpus, Learner Corpus of Academic Writing, comprising 52,404 words. The present study employed LancsBox as the corpus tool and The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays as the control corpus to assist the analysis. The study results show that all primary categories of LAs are found in the corpus. However, the subcategory transition to another topic is absent from the corpus. In the frequency of use, causal resultative LAs outnumber all other categories, followed by additive and adversative LAs. As for the least frequent LAs, the study identified sequential types. In comparison to the native writer corpus, it is found that there are shared similarities, including the categories and the subcategories of LAs found in both corpora. Regarding the frequency of use, the most frequent types are relatively similar with different positions, namely causal resultative and additive LAs, while the least frequent type is sequential. These results suggest more considerations in designing writing materials, especially in regard to transition markers belonging to the sequential category. ","PeriodicalId":427899,"journal":{"name":"IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing is the activity of arranging and organizing ideas that need some logical connectors to make the ideas cohesively structured. There are several plausible means for cohesiveness, including linking adverbials (LAs). This study examines the LA categories found in EFL students’ academic essays and explores how EL students use them. The data were collected from students’ essays compiled as a learner corpus, Learner Corpus of Academic Writing, comprising 52,404 words. The present study employed LancsBox as the corpus tool and The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays as the control corpus to assist the analysis. The study results show that all primary categories of LAs are found in the corpus. However, the subcategory transition to another topic is absent from the corpus. In the frequency of use, causal resultative LAs outnumber all other categories, followed by additive and adversative LAs. As for the least frequent LAs, the study identified sequential types. In comparison to the native writer corpus, it is found that there are shared similarities, including the categories and the subcategories of LAs found in both corpora. Regarding the frequency of use, the most frequent types are relatively similar with different positions, namely causal resultative and additive LAs, while the least frequent type is sequential. These results suggest more considerations in designing writing materials, especially in regard to transition markers belonging to the sequential category. 
印尼语英语学生作文中的连系状语:语料库驱动的研究
写作是安排和组织思想的活动,需要一些逻辑连接器使思想有凝聚力。有几种似是而非的衔接方式,包括连接状语。本研究考察了英语学生在学术论文中发现的LA类别,并探讨了英语学生如何使用它们。这些数据是从学生的论文中收集来的,这些论文被汇编成学习者语料库,即学术写作学习者语料库,包括52,404个单词。本研究采用LancsBox作为语料库工具,Louvain Native English Essays语料库作为对照语料库辅助分析。研究结果表明,在语料库中发现了所有主要类型的LAs。然而,语料库中没有子类别到另一个主题的转换。在使用频率方面,因果结果性LAs的数量超过所有其他类别,其次是添加性和不利性LAs。至于最不频繁的LAs,该研究确定了顺序类型。通过与本地作者语料库的比较,我们发现两种语料库在类别和子类别上都有共同的相似之处。在使用频率方面,使用频率最高的类型是相对相似的,但位置不同,即因果结果式和加性LAs,而使用频率最低的类型是顺序式。这些结果表明,在设计写作材料时需要更多的考虑,特别是关于属于顺序类别的过渡标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信