IEC vs. IEEE/ANSI Medium Voltage Switchgear: Which One Should You Use and Does it Matter?

J. Webb, Babu S Valiyattil, Terry Neighbours, H. Karandikar
{"title":"IEC vs. IEEE/ANSI Medium Voltage Switchgear: Which One Should You Use and Does it Matter?","authors":"J. Webb, Babu S Valiyattil, Terry Neighbours, H. Karandikar","doi":"10.1109/PCIC30934.2019.9074491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most companies engaged in the Oil, Gas & Chemicals sector have global operations. For simplicity, commonality and increased reliability of operations and for economies of scale in procurement the companies prefer to buy common products across all operations. When it comes to switchgear, the issue of which switchgear standard to follow then becomes critical with the IEC and IEEE/ANSI ones being most common. New versions of relevant circuit breaker and switchgear standards have been released by both IEC and IEEE in the past couple of years. An increasing degree of commonality can be seen in these standards. It is an opportune time to revisit the topic of whether it matters which set of standards is followed. In this paper, we cover the key similarities and differences between the underlying breaker standards and the switchgear standards, e.g., IEC 62271-200, IEEE C37.20.2 & C37.20.7, and see what the implications are for the applications seen in our industry.","PeriodicalId":276673,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee Conference (PCIC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee Conference (PCIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCIC30934.2019.9074491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most companies engaged in the Oil, Gas & Chemicals sector have global operations. For simplicity, commonality and increased reliability of operations and for economies of scale in procurement the companies prefer to buy common products across all operations. When it comes to switchgear, the issue of which switchgear standard to follow then becomes critical with the IEC and IEEE/ANSI ones being most common. New versions of relevant circuit breaker and switchgear standards have been released by both IEC and IEEE in the past couple of years. An increasing degree of commonality can be seen in these standards. It is an opportune time to revisit the topic of whether it matters which set of standards is followed. In this paper, we cover the key similarities and differences between the underlying breaker standards and the switchgear standards, e.g., IEC 62271-200, IEEE C37.20.2 & C37.20.7, and see what the implications are for the applications seen in our industry.
IEC与IEEE/ANSI中压开关设备:你应该使用哪一个,它重要吗?
大多数从事石油、天然气和化工行业的公司都有全球业务。为了操作的简单性、通用性和更高的可靠性,以及采购中的规模经济,公司倾向于在所有操作中购买通用产品。当涉及到开关柜时,遵循哪个开关柜标准的问题变得至关重要,IEC和IEEE/ANSI标准是最常见的。在过去的几年中,IEC和IEEE都发布了相关断路器和开关柜标准的新版本。在这些标准中可以看到越来越多的共性。现在正是重新讨论遵循哪一套标准是否重要的时候。在本文中,我们介绍了潜在断路器标准和开关柜标准之间的关键异同,例如IEC 62271-200, IEEE C37.20.2和C37.20.7,并了解其对我们行业中应用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信