{"title":"An Assessment of Clinician and Patient Baseline Knowledge and Preferences Regarding Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Tjörvi E Perry","doi":"10.47363/jcrrr/2021(2)139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To delineate the current knowledge of, and preference for perioperative red blood cell transfusion by clinician and patients. Methods: In this single center study, clinicians and patients were asked to complete a 21-item survey, and a 19-item survey, respectively. Results: On a 7-point category scale, clinicians felt more knowledgeable about when red blood cells should be transfused (5.5 vs 2.1; p<0.0001), clinicians, in preparation for open heart surgery, were more interested in hearing about the risks and benefits of a blood transfusion (4.6 vs 2.6; p<0.0001), and more clinicians felt it was important for them to be involved in deciding whether they should receive a blood transfusion (5.7 vs 5.0; p=0.015). The majority of clinicians chose hemoglobin triggers of either <7.5 mg/dL for non-cardiac surgery or 7.5-8.9 mg/dL for cardiac surgery, while patients either felt they did not have enough information or did not know. Conclusion: Our results highlight important differences between clinicians and patients in the basic knowledge about, and preferences for perioperative red blood transfusion, and imply a clinician-driven decision model to transfuse RBCs, and supports future efforts to develop decision aids to facilitate patient involvement in the shared decision-making about perioperative transfusion.","PeriodicalId":430938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology Research Review & Reports","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology Research Review & Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jcrrr/2021(2)139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To delineate the current knowledge of, and preference for perioperative red blood cell transfusion by clinician and patients. Methods: In this single center study, clinicians and patients were asked to complete a 21-item survey, and a 19-item survey, respectively. Results: On a 7-point category scale, clinicians felt more knowledgeable about when red blood cells should be transfused (5.5 vs 2.1; p<0.0001), clinicians, in preparation for open heart surgery, were more interested in hearing about the risks and benefits of a blood transfusion (4.6 vs 2.6; p<0.0001), and more clinicians felt it was important for them to be involved in deciding whether they should receive a blood transfusion (5.7 vs 5.0; p=0.015). The majority of clinicians chose hemoglobin triggers of either <7.5 mg/dL for non-cardiac surgery or 7.5-8.9 mg/dL for cardiac surgery, while patients either felt they did not have enough information or did not know. Conclusion: Our results highlight important differences between clinicians and patients in the basic knowledge about, and preferences for perioperative red blood transfusion, and imply a clinician-driven decision model to transfuse RBCs, and supports future efforts to develop decision aids to facilitate patient involvement in the shared decision-making about perioperative transfusion.
目的:了解临床医生和患者对围手术期输血的认识和偏好。方法:在这项单中心研究中,临床医生和患者分别完成了21项调查和19项调查。结果:在7分的分类量表中,临床医生对何时应该输注红细胞更了解(5.5 vs 2.1;P <0.0001),准备进行心脏直视手术的临床医生更有兴趣了解输血的风险和益处(4.6 vs 2.6;P <0.0001),更多的临床医生认为参与决定是否应该接受输血对他们很重要(5.7 vs 5.0;p = 0.015)。大多数临床医生选择血红蛋白触发值为<7.5 mg/dL的非心脏手术或7.5-8.9 mg/dL的心脏手术,而患者认为他们没有足够的信息或不知道。结论:我们的研究结果突出了临床医生和患者在围手术期输血的基本知识和偏好方面的重要差异,并暗示了临床驱动的红细胞输注决策模型,并支持未来开发决策辅助工具以促进患者参与围手术期输血的共同决策。