The management of the malposition of intrauterine devices at the tertiary center

Arife Akay, B. Dilbaz, S. Dilbaz, Yaprak Engin Üstün
{"title":"The management of the malposition of intrauterine devices at the tertiary center","authors":"Arife Akay, B. Dilbaz, S. Dilbaz, Yaprak Engin Üstün","doi":"10.51271/jcogp-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The malposition of intrauterine devices (IUD) is a major problem in contraception and this study aims to evaluate the surgical procedures used in the management of these cases.\nMethods: Patients who were operated on for malposition of copper T IUD between 2018-2021 were evaluated retrospectively. The cases were analyzed in 4 groups as followed; instrumental removal, hysteroscopic (H/S), laparoscopic (L/S), and laparotomic (LPT) procedure. The groups were compared in age, obstetric history, IUD insertion time, and intraoperative outcomes.\nResults: There were a total of 39 cases and the groups consisted of instrumental removal (n=8), H/S (n=24), L/S (n=6), and LPT (n=1) procedure. In the H/S group, mean age (44 ±10) and duration of IUD use (10.1 ±7.5 years) were found to be significantly higher than the other groups (p=0.03 and p=0.001 ). Six cases (25%) in the H/S group IUD was in the uterine cavity while in 5 (20.8%) it was embedded in the endometrium and myometrium. In the L/S group, the duration of IUD use was shorter (1.3 ± 0.8 years) and the mean age (29±10) was lower and all cases were managed laparoscopically except in one case that was extracted after conversion to laparotomy. \nConclusion: Advanced age and prolonged IUD use are risk factors for embedded of the IUD in the uterine cavity in the hysteroscopy group, however, IUDs that reach the abdomen by ruptured uterus are detected at younger ages and earlier in IUD use, and minimally invasive methods are eligible surgical procedures for these cases.","PeriodicalId":190423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Controversies in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Controversies in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/jcogp-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The malposition of intrauterine devices (IUD) is a major problem in contraception and this study aims to evaluate the surgical procedures used in the management of these cases. Methods: Patients who were operated on for malposition of copper T IUD between 2018-2021 were evaluated retrospectively. The cases were analyzed in 4 groups as followed; instrumental removal, hysteroscopic (H/S), laparoscopic (L/S), and laparotomic (LPT) procedure. The groups were compared in age, obstetric history, IUD insertion time, and intraoperative outcomes. Results: There were a total of 39 cases and the groups consisted of instrumental removal (n=8), H/S (n=24), L/S (n=6), and LPT (n=1) procedure. In the H/S group, mean age (44 ±10) and duration of IUD use (10.1 ±7.5 years) were found to be significantly higher than the other groups (p=0.03 and p=0.001 ). Six cases (25%) in the H/S group IUD was in the uterine cavity while in 5 (20.8%) it was embedded in the endometrium and myometrium. In the L/S group, the duration of IUD use was shorter (1.3 ± 0.8 years) and the mean age (29±10) was lower and all cases were managed laparoscopically except in one case that was extracted after conversion to laparotomy. Conclusion: Advanced age and prolonged IUD use are risk factors for embedded of the IUD in the uterine cavity in the hysteroscopy group, however, IUDs that reach the abdomen by ruptured uterus are detected at younger ages and earlier in IUD use, and minimally invasive methods are eligible surgical procedures for these cases.
三级中心宫内节育器放置位置异常的处理
目的:宫内节育器(IUD)错位是避孕中的一个主要问题,本研究旨在评估手术方法在处理这些病例中的应用。方法:回顾性分析2018-2021年收治的铜宫内节育器放置错位手术患者。将病例分为4组进行分析:器械切除、宫腔镜(H/S)、腹腔镜(L/S)和剖腹手术(LPT)。比较两组的年龄、产科史、宫内节育器插入时间和术中结果。结果:共39例,分别为器械切除(n=8)、H/S (n=24)、L/S (n=6)、LPT (n=1)。H/S组患者的平均年龄(44±10岁)和宫内节育器使用时间(10.1±7.5年)显著高于其他组(p=0.03和p=0.001)。H/S组宫内节育器位于宫腔内6例(25%),嵌入子宫内膜及子宫肌层5例(20.8%)。L/S组宫内节育器使用时间较短(1.3±0.8年),平均年龄(29±10岁)较低,除1例转开腹后取出外,其余均行腹腔镜手术。结论:高龄和使用宫内节育器时间过长是宫腔镜组宫内节育器嵌入宫腔的危险因素,但宫内节育器经子宫破裂到达腹部的发现年龄较轻,使用宫内节育器的时间较早,微创方法是适合此类病例的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书