Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Epoxy Resin in the Centre of Portugal

Mariana Ferreira Bastos, R. Batista, Diogo Laertes, J. Calvão, M. Gonçalo
{"title":"Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Epoxy Resin in the Centre of Portugal","authors":"Mariana Ferreira Bastos, R. Batista, Diogo Laertes, J. Calvão, M. Gonçalo","doi":"10.29021/spdv.77.3.1109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis is a very common occupational disease and epoxy resins are among its main causes. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with positive patch test reactions to epoxy resin detected in the Coimbra Hospital and University Center between 2012 and 2018 and compare with the results of patients patch tested between 1999 and 2008 at the same Institution. \nMethod and Materials.  Within aretrospective analysis of the files of patients with positive patch test reactions (1+ or more intense) to epoxy resin of bisfenol A tested at 1% pet. within the Baseline Series between 2012 and 2018, we characterized demographic and clinical data of reactive patients, evaluated the relevance of the reaction, sources of exposure to epoxy resin with particular attention to occupational exposures, other positive reactions and the impact of the results of the tests in the work conditions of these patients. Lastly, we compared these results with a previous study performed in the same Hospital between 1999 and 2008. \nResults. Among 2363 patch tested patients during the study period we found 23 patients (0.97%), 17 males and 6 females, who developed contact allergy to epoxy resins. In 22 cases we identified a relevant occupational exposure: 9 from construction industry; 9 workers from wind-mill turbines factory for Eolic energy; 2 from fiberglass factories; 1 from a chemical factory and 1 from a Wastewater Treatment Plant. In 1 patient (a teacher) no relevance was found. Of these 22 workers, 9 (39.1%) had both hand and airborne lesions, while 8 (34.8%) had lesions exclusively on the hands and 5 (21.7%) had predominately airborne dermatitis. Four of the 23 (17.4%) reacted exclusively to the epoxy resin, and 11 of 18 (61.1%) also reacted to 0.25% hexanediol diglycidyl ether. Avoidance resulted in a significant improvement of symptoms. Compared to the previous period (1999-2008), there are no significative changes apart from a slight increase in the frequency of the allergic reactions to epoxy resins and its main source of exposure. \nConclusions. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resin has slightly increased in this Portuguese Center mostly due to workers from wind-mill turbines factory for Eolic energy, a recent industry implanted in this region. This allergen still causes almost exclusively occupational dermatitis, either hand, airborne, or both.","PeriodicalId":238976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.77.3.1109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis is a very common occupational disease and epoxy resins are among its main causes. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with positive patch test reactions to epoxy resin detected in the Coimbra Hospital and University Center between 2012 and 2018 and compare with the results of patients patch tested between 1999 and 2008 at the same Institution. Method and Materials.  Within aretrospective analysis of the files of patients with positive patch test reactions (1+ or more intense) to epoxy resin of bisfenol A tested at 1% pet. within the Baseline Series between 2012 and 2018, we characterized demographic and clinical data of reactive patients, evaluated the relevance of the reaction, sources of exposure to epoxy resin with particular attention to occupational exposures, other positive reactions and the impact of the results of the tests in the work conditions of these patients. Lastly, we compared these results with a previous study performed in the same Hospital between 1999 and 2008. Results. Among 2363 patch tested patients during the study period we found 23 patients (0.97%), 17 males and 6 females, who developed contact allergy to epoxy resins. In 22 cases we identified a relevant occupational exposure: 9 from construction industry; 9 workers from wind-mill turbines factory for Eolic energy; 2 from fiberglass factories; 1 from a chemical factory and 1 from a Wastewater Treatment Plant. In 1 patient (a teacher) no relevance was found. Of these 22 workers, 9 (39.1%) had both hand and airborne lesions, while 8 (34.8%) had lesions exclusively on the hands and 5 (21.7%) had predominately airborne dermatitis. Four of the 23 (17.4%) reacted exclusively to the epoxy resin, and 11 of 18 (61.1%) also reacted to 0.25% hexanediol diglycidyl ether. Avoidance resulted in a significant improvement of symptoms. Compared to the previous period (1999-2008), there are no significative changes apart from a slight increase in the frequency of the allergic reactions to epoxy resins and its main source of exposure. Conclusions. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resin has slightly increased in this Portuguese Center mostly due to workers from wind-mill turbines factory for Eolic energy, a recent industry implanted in this region. This allergen still causes almost exclusively occupational dermatitis, either hand, airborne, or both.
葡萄牙中部由环氧树脂引起的职业性过敏性接触性皮炎
介绍。职业性过敏性接触性皮炎是一种非常常见的职业病,环氧树脂是其主要病因之一。本研究的目的是表征2012年至2018年在科英布拉医院和大学中心检测到的环氧树脂贴片试验阳性反应的患者,并与1999年至2008年在同一机构进行的患者贴片试验结果进行比较。方法和材料。回顾性分析了在1% pet浓度下对双酚A环氧树脂贴片试验反应阳性(1+或更强烈)的患者档案。在2012年至2018年的基线系列中,我们对反应性患者的人口统计学和临床数据进行了表征,评估了反应的相关性、环氧树脂暴露来源(特别关注职业暴露)、其他阳性反应以及测试结果对这些患者工作条件的影响。最后,我们将这些结果与1999年至2008年在同一家医院进行的先前研究进行了比较。结果。在研究期间的2363例患者中,发现23例(0.97%)患者出现环氧树脂接触性过敏,其中男性17例,女性6例。在22例病例中,我们确定了相关的职业暴露:9例来自建筑行业;9名风力涡轮机工厂工人;2个来自玻璃纤维工厂;1个来自化工厂,1个来自污水处理厂。1例(教师)无相关性。在这22名工人中,9名(39.1%)同时患有手部和空气传播皮炎,8名(34.8%)仅患有手部皮炎,5名(21.7%)主要患有空气传播皮炎。其中4个(17.4%)只与环氧树脂反应,11个(61.1%)也与0.25%的己二醇二缩水甘油醚反应。避免服用可显著改善症状。与前一时期(1999-2008年)相比,除了环氧树脂过敏反应的频率及其主要暴露源略有增加外,没有显著变化。结论。在这个葡萄牙中心,环氧树脂过敏性接触性皮炎的患病率略有上升,主要是由于Eolic能源风力涡轮机工厂的工人,这是一个最近在该地区植入的工业。这种过敏原仍然引起几乎完全职业性皮炎,无论是手,空气传播,或两者兼而有之。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信