Investigating Uncertainty in Postoperative Bleeding Management: Design Principles for Decision Support

D. Robinson, Luke Church, A. Blackwell, A. Vuylsteke, Kenton O’Hara, M. Besser
{"title":"Investigating Uncertainty in Postoperative Bleeding Management: Design Principles for Decision Support","authors":"D. Robinson, Luke Church, A. Blackwell, A. Vuylsteke, Kenton O’Hara, M. Besser","doi":"10.14236/ewic/hci2022.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision-making under uncertainty is a difficult and unavoidable challenge in clinical contexts. Technologies such as probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) allow their users to explicitly model and reason with uncertainty. By taking a user-centric approach to the deployment of these technologies, we believe there is an opportunity to involve clinicians in the modelling process. In this paper, we present a field study of decisions taken to manage postoperative bleeding. From analysis of the findings, we outline three central themes that emerge and discuss implications for design, developing a set of evaluative design principles to assess a PPL-based tool in this context. These include visualising zones of optimal intervention, surfacing relative risk trade-offs between teams, and accessing specialist views within a holistic picture. These findings provide a structure for critically exploring PPL-based tools to support clinical reasoning under uncertainty. clinical decision","PeriodicalId":413003,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Workshops in Computing","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Workshops in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2022.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision-making under uncertainty is a difficult and unavoidable challenge in clinical contexts. Technologies such as probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) allow their users to explicitly model and reason with uncertainty. By taking a user-centric approach to the deployment of these technologies, we believe there is an opportunity to involve clinicians in the modelling process. In this paper, we present a field study of decisions taken to manage postoperative bleeding. From analysis of the findings, we outline three central themes that emerge and discuss implications for design, developing a set of evaluative design principles to assess a PPL-based tool in this context. These include visualising zones of optimal intervention, surfacing relative risk trade-offs between teams, and accessing specialist views within a holistic picture. These findings provide a structure for critically exploring PPL-based tools to support clinical reasoning under uncertainty. clinical decision
调查术后出血管理的不确定性:决策支持的设计原则
在临床环境中,不确定性下的决策是一个困难和不可避免的挑战。诸如概率编程语言(ppl)之类的技术允许其用户显式地对不确定性进行建模和推理。通过采用以用户为中心的方法来部署这些技术,我们相信有机会让临床医生参与建模过程。在这篇论文中,我们提出了一项关于处理术后出血的决策的实地研究。通过对研究结果的分析,我们概述了三个中心主题,并讨论了对设计的影响,制定了一套评估性设计原则,以评估在这种情况下基于ppp的工具。这些包括可视化最佳干预区域,显示团队之间的相对风险权衡,以及在整体画面中获取专家意见。这些发现为批判性地探索基于ppp的工具提供了一个结构,以支持不确定性下的临床推理。临床决策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信