Object vs Pixel-based Flood/Drought Detection in Paddy Fields using Deep Learning

Aakash Thapa, B. Neupane, T. Horanont
{"title":"Object vs Pixel-based Flood/Drought Detection in Paddy Fields using Deep Learning","authors":"Aakash Thapa, B. Neupane, T. Horanont","doi":"10.1109/IIAIAAI55812.2022.00095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disasters like flood and drought in paddy fields create unprecedented issues for farmers and a country’s economy. Some countries compensate these farmers based on the validation to the victim’s claims. In this paper, we study two deep learning-based methods that can verify these claims from the geo-tagged photographs sent by the farmers of their farms at the time of the disaster. Moreover, we demonstrate and compare the efficiency of the two methods: pixel-based semantic segmentation using DeepLabv3+ and an object-based scene recognition method using PlacesCNN. Both of the methods are powered by ResNet architecture backbones. Due to the unavailability of existing datasets for agricultural scenes, especially for the paddy farms, we prepare our own training dataset to train the Deeplabv3+ model and use an existing dataset for the PlacesCNN model. We further create a decision-based method framework that allows us to predict flood and drought from several other classes. The DeepLabv3+ and PlacesCNN-based methods achieve an accuracy of 89.09% and 93.64% respectively. Our experiments show that the object-based method is superior to the pixel-based approach in terms of accuracy, data preparation, computational speed and expense.","PeriodicalId":156230,"journal":{"name":"2022 12th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 12th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAIAAI55812.2022.00095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disasters like flood and drought in paddy fields create unprecedented issues for farmers and a country’s economy. Some countries compensate these farmers based on the validation to the victim’s claims. In this paper, we study two deep learning-based methods that can verify these claims from the geo-tagged photographs sent by the farmers of their farms at the time of the disaster. Moreover, we demonstrate and compare the efficiency of the two methods: pixel-based semantic segmentation using DeepLabv3+ and an object-based scene recognition method using PlacesCNN. Both of the methods are powered by ResNet architecture backbones. Due to the unavailability of existing datasets for agricultural scenes, especially for the paddy farms, we prepare our own training dataset to train the Deeplabv3+ model and use an existing dataset for the PlacesCNN model. We further create a decision-based method framework that allows us to predict flood and drought from several other classes. The DeepLabv3+ and PlacesCNN-based methods achieve an accuracy of 89.09% and 93.64% respectively. Our experiments show that the object-based method is superior to the pixel-based approach in terms of accuracy, data preparation, computational speed and expense.
使用深度学习的水田对象vs基于像素的水旱检测
水田的洪水和干旱等灾害给农民和一个国家的经济带来了前所未有的问题。一些国家根据受害者索赔的真实性对这些农民进行赔偿。在本文中,我们研究了两种基于深度学习的方法,可以从灾难发生时农民发送的带有地理标记的照片中验证这些说法。此外,我们还演示并比较了两种方法的效率:基于像素的DeepLabv3+语义分割方法和基于对象的场景识别方法使用PlacesCNN。这两种方法都由ResNet架构主干提供支持。由于现有的农业场景数据集不可用,特别是对于稻田,我们准备了自己的训练数据集来训练Deeplabv3+模型,并使用现有的数据集来训练PlacesCNN模型。我们进一步创建一个基于决策的方法框架,使我们能够从其他几个类中预测洪水和干旱。基于DeepLabv3+和placescnn的方法准确率分别为89.09%和93.64%。我们的实验表明,基于对象的方法在精度、数据准备、计算速度和费用方面优于基于像素的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信