INSTRUMENTS OF ASEAN RESILIENCE AMIDST THE CRISES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

A. Korolev, E. Vaseneva
{"title":"INSTRUMENTS OF ASEAN RESILIENCE AMIDST THE CRISES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"A. Korolev, E. Vaseneva","doi":"10.31696/2072-8271-2022-2-2-55-034-049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article undertakes a comparative analysis of ASEAN resilience instruments amidst the three most severe socio-economic crises that the union has faced over the past 25 years. These are the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis and the corona crisis from early 2020 to the present. All three cases reveal similarities in ASEAN’s response models to socio-economic shocks, which is limited to three tools. In the analyzed cases active \"institution building\" in Southeast Asia can be identified. It included the launch of formal and informal committees, platforms, and ad hoc response centers. To a lesser extent, this is relevant to ASEAN's response to the 2008 crisis. With the exception of the global financial crisis, the greatest contribution to the stress-resistance of the association was made by ASEAN dialogue partners, which, as experience shows, led to an increased dependence of the member-states on financial assistance from extra-regional actors. This is clearly exemplified by cooperation in the ASEAN+3 format. A similar instrument to ensure ASEAN's resilience in all three cases is the reliance on foreign trade liberalization and promotion of free trade agreements. This instrument became particularly necessary after the global financial crisis of 2008, when the Association developed an exten-sive FTAs system.","PeriodicalId":269478,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2072-8271-2022-2-2-55-034-049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article undertakes a comparative analysis of ASEAN resilience instruments amidst the three most severe socio-economic crises that the union has faced over the past 25 years. These are the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis and the corona crisis from early 2020 to the present. All three cases reveal similarities in ASEAN’s response models to socio-economic shocks, which is limited to three tools. In the analyzed cases active "institution building" in Southeast Asia can be identified. It included the launch of formal and informal committees, platforms, and ad hoc response centers. To a lesser extent, this is relevant to ASEAN's response to the 2008 crisis. With the exception of the global financial crisis, the greatest contribution to the stress-resistance of the association was made by ASEAN dialogue partners, which, as experience shows, led to an increased dependence of the member-states on financial assistance from extra-regional actors. This is clearly exemplified by cooperation in the ASEAN+3 format. A similar instrument to ensure ASEAN's resilience in all three cases is the reliance on foreign trade liberalization and promotion of free trade agreements. This instrument became particularly necessary after the global financial crisis of 2008, when the Association developed an exten-sive FTAs system.
危机中东盟恢复力的工具:比较分析
本文对东盟在过去25年中面临的三次最严重的社会经济危机中的恢复力工具进行了比较分析。分别是1997年亚洲金融危机、2008年全球金融危机和2020年初至今的冠状病毒危机。这三个案例都揭示了东盟应对社会经济冲击模式的相似之处,这些模式仅限于三种工具。在分析的案例中,可以发现东南亚地区积极的“制度建设”。它包括启动正式和非正式委员会、平台和特设反应中心。在较小程度上,这与东盟对2008年危机的反应有关。除了全球金融危机之外,东盟对话伙伴对该联盟的抗压性贡献最大,经验表明,这导致成员国越来越依赖区域外行为体的财政援助。东盟与中日韩合作就是一个很好的例证。确保东盟在上述三种情况下恢复力的一个类似手段是依赖对外贸易自由化和促进自由贸易协定。在2008年全球金融危机之后,该协会发展了一个广泛的自由贸易协定体系,这一工具变得尤为必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信