Assessment of HPV screening methods and sample storage in oral lichen planus lesions

A. Poulopoulos, M. Hempel, G. Karakitsos, A. Fakis, D. Andreadis
{"title":"Assessment of HPV screening methods and sample storage in oral lichen planus lesions","authors":"A. Poulopoulos, M. Hempel, G. Karakitsos, A. Fakis, D. Andreadis","doi":"10.1177/2057178X17727674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We investigated the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA distribution in oral lichen planus (OLP) samples using non-invasive methods, with the potential for much broader population screening. Methods: Three different non-invasive collection methods (dry storage, lysis buffer preservation, and use of a commercial tool to rake epithelial cells and immersion of the collection device into the provided rinse solution) were evaluated. HPV DNA was detected in brushed or scraped samples of the lesion site using a commercial HPV DNA polymerase chain reaction kit. Results: In the group of patients with OLP lesions, HPV was detected significantly more frequently than in the healthy control group (lysis buffer for control = 2.1%, p = 0.046; DNA•SAL™ rinse solution for control = 4.2%, p = 0.0003; dry storage for control = 6.3%, p = 0.0001) regardless of the different collection and preservation methods. HPV DNA was detected in 12.85% of the samples preserved in lysis buffer. HPV DNA was detected in 34.28% (p = 0.0048 vs. lysis buffer) of samples preserved in the DNA•SAL rinse solution. In the case of dry storage, HPV DNA was detected in 38.57% (p = 0.0008 vs. lysis buffer and p = 0.726 vs. DNA•SAL) of samples. Conclusion: The results suggest that the most effective sample preservation methods are provided by dry storage or DNA•SAL collection compared to lysis buffer. Our findings indicated that HPV DNA detection in superficial OLP scrapings has potential as a screening tool and has important applications for both research and clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":233876,"journal":{"name":"Translational Research in Oral Oncology","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Research in Oral Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057178X17727674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: We investigated the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA distribution in oral lichen planus (OLP) samples using non-invasive methods, with the potential for much broader population screening. Methods: Three different non-invasive collection methods (dry storage, lysis buffer preservation, and use of a commercial tool to rake epithelial cells and immersion of the collection device into the provided rinse solution) were evaluated. HPV DNA was detected in brushed or scraped samples of the lesion site using a commercial HPV DNA polymerase chain reaction kit. Results: In the group of patients with OLP lesions, HPV was detected significantly more frequently than in the healthy control group (lysis buffer for control = 2.1%, p = 0.046; DNA•SAL™ rinse solution for control = 4.2%, p = 0.0003; dry storage for control = 6.3%, p = 0.0001) regardless of the different collection and preservation methods. HPV DNA was detected in 12.85% of the samples preserved in lysis buffer. HPV DNA was detected in 34.28% (p = 0.0048 vs. lysis buffer) of samples preserved in the DNA•SAL rinse solution. In the case of dry storage, HPV DNA was detected in 38.57% (p = 0.0008 vs. lysis buffer and p = 0.726 vs. DNA•SAL) of samples. Conclusion: The results suggest that the most effective sample preservation methods are provided by dry storage or DNA•SAL collection compared to lysis buffer. Our findings indicated that HPV DNA detection in superficial OLP scrapings has potential as a screening tool and has important applications for both research and clinical practice.
口腔扁平苔藓病变中HPV筛查方法及样本保存的评价
目的:我们使用非侵入性方法研究口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)样本中的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV) DNA分布,具有更广泛人群筛查的潜力。方法:评估了三种不同的非侵入性收集方法(干燥储存,裂解缓冲保存,使用商业工具提取上皮细胞并将收集装置浸入所提供的冲洗溶液中)。使用商业HPV DNA聚合酶链反应试剂盒在病变部位的刷拭或刮拭样本中检测HPV DNA。结果:在OLP病变组中,HPV检测频率明显高于健康对照组(对照组裂解缓冲液= 2.1%,p = 0.046;DNA•SAL™冲洗液为对照= 4.2%,p = 0.0003;干储存= 6.3%,p = 0.0001),无论不同的收集和保存方法。在裂解缓冲液中保存的12.85%的样品中检测到HPV DNA。在DNA•SAL冲洗液中保存的样品中,HPV DNA检出率为34.28% (p = 0.0048 vs.裂解缓冲液)。在干燥储存的情况下,38.57%的样品中检测到HPV DNA (p = 0.0008,裂解缓冲液p = 0.0008, DNA•SAL p = 0.726)。结论:与裂解缓冲液相比,干燥储存或DNA•SAL收集是最有效的样品保存方法。我们的研究结果表明,在浅表OLP刮痕中检测HPV DNA具有作为筛查工具的潜力,在研究和临床实践中都有重要的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信