A Model Crypto-Asset Regulatory Framework

L. Perlman
{"title":"A Model Crypto-Asset Regulatory Framework","authors":"L. Perlman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3370679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A stylized ‘crypto-asset’ regulatory framework (‘Framework’) is presented. \n \nIt is designed to capture the regulatory permutations and implications of the most prevalent and evolving forms of tradable value created through the use of evolving cryptographically-based (‘crypto’) schemes, as well as their stylized position in a financial ecosystem. The most prevalent of these value-based schemes are based on what is now known as distributed ledger technologies (DLTs), with the main type of DLT in use known as ‘blockchain’ technology. \n \nValue-based applications that can be derived or generated from use of DLTs are known in this Framework as (private) crypto-assets. They can be distinguished from (public) applications of crypto-based value such as those planned by sovereign states for use as legal tender. \n \nThe main focus of the Framework is on these evolving ‘private’ use of crypto-assets and their representation as cryptographically-secure and traceable ‘tokens’ of value. These tokenized assets can be traded – that is transferred or exchanged - within regulated or unregulated exchanges, or directly, securely and independently between parties without the need for a centralized exchange. \nTogether they form what could be termed the ‘crypto-economy.’ \n \nAll these developments challenge the four corners of existing legal and regulatory frameworks with, as yet, no global unanimity as to which regulators have oversight over all or some components of these crypto-assets. \n \nThe overall goal of any regulation would be to fasten the activities of the most proximate regulators to particular asset classes or value transfer/exchange mechanisms so as to avoid regulatory arbitrage. Where there are no proximate regulations to do so, regulatory sandboxes by the most proximate regulators could be employed. \n \nThe model Framework presented is designed to systematize the evolving asset types.","PeriodicalId":105752,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Regulatory Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Regulatory Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3370679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A stylized ‘crypto-asset’ regulatory framework (‘Framework’) is presented. It is designed to capture the regulatory permutations and implications of the most prevalent and evolving forms of tradable value created through the use of evolving cryptographically-based (‘crypto’) schemes, as well as their stylized position in a financial ecosystem. The most prevalent of these value-based schemes are based on what is now known as distributed ledger technologies (DLTs), with the main type of DLT in use known as ‘blockchain’ technology. Value-based applications that can be derived or generated from use of DLTs are known in this Framework as (private) crypto-assets. They can be distinguished from (public) applications of crypto-based value such as those planned by sovereign states for use as legal tender. The main focus of the Framework is on these evolving ‘private’ use of crypto-assets and their representation as cryptographically-secure and traceable ‘tokens’ of value. These tokenized assets can be traded – that is transferred or exchanged - within regulated or unregulated exchanges, or directly, securely and independently between parties without the need for a centralized exchange. Together they form what could be termed the ‘crypto-economy.’ All these developments challenge the four corners of existing legal and regulatory frameworks with, as yet, no global unanimity as to which regulators have oversight over all or some components of these crypto-assets. The overall goal of any regulation would be to fasten the activities of the most proximate regulators to particular asset classes or value transfer/exchange mechanisms so as to avoid regulatory arbitrage. Where there are no proximate regulations to do so, regulatory sandboxes by the most proximate regulators could be employed. The model Framework presented is designed to systematize the evolving asset types.
加密资产监管框架模型
提出了一个程式化的“加密资产”监管框架(“框架”)。它旨在捕捉通过使用不断发展的基于密码学的(“加密”)方案创造的最普遍和不断发展的可交易价值形式的监管排列和影响,以及它们在金融生态系统中的风格化地位。这些基于价值的方案中最流行的是基于现在被称为分布式账本技术(DLT)的方案,其中使用的DLT的主要类型被称为“区块链”技术。在本框架中,可以通过使用dlt派生或生成的基于价值的应用程序被称为(私有)加密资产。它们可以与基于加密的价值的(公开)应用(例如主权国家计划用作法定货币的应用)区分开来。该框架的主要重点是这些不断发展的加密资产的“私人”使用,以及它们作为加密安全和可追踪的价值“令牌”的表示。这些代币化资产可以在受监管或不受监管的交易所内进行交易(即转让或交换),也可以在各方之间直接、安全、独立地进行交易,而无需集中交换。它们共同构成了所谓的“加密经济”。“所有这些发展都挑战了现有法律和监管框架的四个方面,迄今为止,全球尚未就哪些监管机构对这些加密资产的全部或部分组成部分进行监管达成一致意见。任何监管的总体目标都是将最接近监管机构的活动与特定资产类别或价值转移/交换机制联系起来,以避免监管套利。在没有相关法规的情况下,可以采用最接近的监管机构的监管沙箱。提出的模型框架旨在将不断发展的资产类型系统化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信