The Illusion of Design: Framing Decisions As a Creative Process Increases Perceived Customization

Alice Moon, M. Bos
{"title":"The Illusion of Design: Framing Decisions As a Creative Process Increases Perceived Customization","authors":"Alice Moon, M. Bos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3092296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technology and big data join forces, consumers are increasingly able to receive customized options. However, despite the abundance of available choice options, people may not necessarily view their choice options as customized to their wants and needs. Across five studies, we provide evidence for a possible psychological solution: Framing choices as a creative process increases a chosen option’s perceived customization, a phenomenon we refer to as the illusion of design. Specifically, even when keeping the choice set constant, choosing by (creative) attributes rather than choosing from all available options produces the illusion of design. Moreover, first providing a blank template further increases perceived customization of the chosen option. The illusion of design arises in part because people feel a greater sense of co-creation when choosing via a seemingly creative process, thereby heightening their perceived customization of the chosen option. Consequently, the illusion of design extends to choices that express preferences (e.g., liking blue over red) and is significantly diminished with choices that describe objective needs (e.g., needing a small versus large T-shirt). Finally, we find that the heightened perceived customization from the illusion of design ultimately results in greater willingness-to-pay for the chosen option.","PeriodicalId":431230,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Consumption","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3092296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As technology and big data join forces, consumers are increasingly able to receive customized options. However, despite the abundance of available choice options, people may not necessarily view their choice options as customized to their wants and needs. Across five studies, we provide evidence for a possible psychological solution: Framing choices as a creative process increases a chosen option’s perceived customization, a phenomenon we refer to as the illusion of design. Specifically, even when keeping the choice set constant, choosing by (creative) attributes rather than choosing from all available options produces the illusion of design. Moreover, first providing a blank template further increases perceived customization of the chosen option. The illusion of design arises in part because people feel a greater sense of co-creation when choosing via a seemingly creative process, thereby heightening their perceived customization of the chosen option. Consequently, the illusion of design extends to choices that express preferences (e.g., liking blue over red) and is significantly diminished with choices that describe objective needs (e.g., needing a small versus large T-shirt). Finally, we find that the heightened perceived customization from the illusion of design ultimately results in greater willingness-to-pay for the chosen option.
设计的幻觉:将决策框架作为一个创造性的过程,增加了可感知的定制
随着技术和大数据的结合,消费者越来越能够获得定制的选择。然而,尽管有大量可用的选择选项,人们可能不一定认为他们的选择选项是根据他们的需要和需求定制的。在五项研究中,我们为一种可能的心理学解决方案提供了证据:将选择框架化为一种创造性的过程,增加了被选择选项的感知定制性,我们将这种现象称为设计幻觉。特别是,即使在保持选择集不变的情况下,根据(创造性)属性进行选择,而不是从所有可用选项中进行选择,也会产生设计的错觉。此外,首先提供一个空白模板进一步增加所选选项的可感知定制性。设计错觉的产生部分是因为当人们通过看似创造性的过程进行选择时,他们会有一种更强烈的共同创造感,从而增强了他们对所选选项的自定义感。因此,设计的错觉扩展到表达偏好的选择(例如,喜欢蓝色而不是红色),并且在描述客观需求的选择(例如,需要小t恤还是大t恤)中显着减少。最后,我们发现,从设计错觉中获得的高度感知定制最终会导致更大的付费意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信