Teacher Power and Gender in the Classroom Discourse of EFL Teacher Educators: Insights from a case study

Issue 18 Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.36602/faj.2021.n18.04
Reda Elmabruk, Nesrin Etarhuni
{"title":"Teacher Power and Gender in the Classroom Discourse of EFL Teacher Educators: Insights from a case study","authors":"Reda Elmabruk, Nesrin Etarhuni","doi":"10.36602/faj.2021.n18.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How Teacher Power (TP) is exerted impacts affective learning and class participation. This mixed-method case-study research explores TP and the role of gender in a Libyan EFL Teacher Education context. Classroom discourse is analysed to determine the scale of Teacher Power Strategies (TPS) manipulated by both male and female educators with respect to Pro-social Teacher Power (PTP) and Anti-social Teacher Power (ATP). Six teacher educators (three males and three females) have been observed over 18 lectures involving 47 second-semester students. How the student teachers perceive and react to TP is explored through focus group interviews. The findings reveal interesting gender differences in the application of anti and pro-social power; the males’ TP ratio (2.3:1) is much greater than the females’ (1.5:1) who display far less ATP, e.g. command power, with zero criticism and zero coercion; PTP is distinguished by politeness and compliment; “command softening”, mitigated power and lowered anxiety. The students tolerate teachers’ command, interruption, questioning for pedagogic reasons; cases of unwarranted coercion and unconstructive criticism are met with silent protest. In conclusion, a balance of power is deemed essential in fostering students’ well-being, promoting a relaxed stress-free atmosphere, and facilitating active student participation.","PeriodicalId":141730,"journal":{"name":"Issue 18","volume":"318 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue 18","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36602/faj.2021.n18.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How Teacher Power (TP) is exerted impacts affective learning and class participation. This mixed-method case-study research explores TP and the role of gender in a Libyan EFL Teacher Education context. Classroom discourse is analysed to determine the scale of Teacher Power Strategies (TPS) manipulated by both male and female educators with respect to Pro-social Teacher Power (PTP) and Anti-social Teacher Power (ATP). Six teacher educators (three males and three females) have been observed over 18 lectures involving 47 second-semester students. How the student teachers perceive and react to TP is explored through focus group interviews. The findings reveal interesting gender differences in the application of anti and pro-social power; the males’ TP ratio (2.3:1) is much greater than the females’ (1.5:1) who display far less ATP, e.g. command power, with zero criticism and zero coercion; PTP is distinguished by politeness and compliment; “command softening”, mitigated power and lowered anxiety. The students tolerate teachers’ command, interruption, questioning for pedagogic reasons; cases of unwarranted coercion and unconstructive criticism are met with silent protest. In conclusion, a balance of power is deemed essential in fostering students’ well-being, promoting a relaxed stress-free atmosphere, and facilitating active student participation.
英语教师课堂话语中的教师权力与性别:个案研究的启示
教师权力如何影响情感学习和课堂参与。这个混合方法的案例研究探讨了教学法和性别在利比亚英语教师教育背景下的作用。通过对课堂话语的分析,确定了男女教育工作者在亲社会教师权力(PTP)和反社会教师权力(ATP)方面所操纵的教师权力策略(TPS)的规模。6名教师教育工作者(3男3女)对47名下学期学生进行了18次讲座。通过焦点小组访谈,探讨学生教师如何感知和反应TP。研究结果揭示了在反社会和亲社会权力的运用上有趣的性别差异;男性的ATP比率(2.3:1)远高于女性(1.5:1),而女性的ATP则远低于男性,如命令权力、零批评和零胁迫;PTP的特点是礼貌和恭维;“命令软化”,减轻了权力,降低了焦虑。学生容忍教师的命令、打断、提问;没有根据的胁迫和没有建设性的批评遭到沉默的抗议。总之,权力的平衡对于培养学生的幸福感、营造轻松无压力的氛围以及促进学生的积极参与至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信