A comparative analysis between different inversion algorithms for process tomographic measurements

G. D'Antona, L. Rocca
{"title":"A comparative analysis between different inversion algorithms for process tomographic measurements","authors":"G. D'Antona, L. Rocca","doi":"10.1109/IMTC.2004.1351337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In measurements science and its technological application most of the measurement methods are indirect. In order to measure the unknown physical quantity y we have, to develop a forward model which relates this quantities to another one x directly measurable: x/spl rarr/y. Often the measurement model available is of the opposite nature, i.e. y/spl rarr/x. It is thus necessary to invert the available model: this operation in some cases can lead to an unacceptable level of uncertainty in the results. The inversion procedure requires regularization techniques in order to limit the uncertainty affecting the indirect measurements. This operation can be accomplished adopting different algorithms proposed by various authors. This paper shows a comparison of some algorithms for processing measured data using ill-conditioned inverse models employed for determining the distribution of indirectly measured quantities. They all perform Tikhonov regularization. The comparison is performed analyzing their metrological performances on the basis of two application tests, one linear and one non linear.","PeriodicalId":386903,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2004.1351337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In measurements science and its technological application most of the measurement methods are indirect. In order to measure the unknown physical quantity y we have, to develop a forward model which relates this quantities to another one x directly measurable: x/spl rarr/y. Often the measurement model available is of the opposite nature, i.e. y/spl rarr/x. It is thus necessary to invert the available model: this operation in some cases can lead to an unacceptable level of uncertainty in the results. The inversion procedure requires regularization techniques in order to limit the uncertainty affecting the indirect measurements. This operation can be accomplished adopting different algorithms proposed by various authors. This paper shows a comparison of some algorithms for processing measured data using ill-conditioned inverse models employed for determining the distribution of indirectly measured quantities. They all perform Tikhonov regularization. The comparison is performed analyzing their metrological performances on the basis of two application tests, one linear and one non linear.
过程层析测量中不同反演算法的比较分析
在测量科学及其技术应用中,大多数测量方法都是间接的。为了测量未知的物理量y,我们开发了一个正向模型,将这个物理量与另一个直接可测量的物理量联系起来:x/spl rarr/y。通常可用的测量模型具有相反的性质,即y/spl rarr/x。因此,有必要反转可用的模型:在某些情况下,这种操作可能导致结果中不可接受的不确定性。反演过程需要正则化技术,以限制影响间接测量的不确定性。该操作可以采用不同作者提出的不同算法来完成。本文比较了用于确定间接测量量分布的病态逆模型处理测量数据的几种算法。它们都执行吉洪诺夫正则化。并在线性和非线性两种应用试验的基础上,对其计量性能进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信