Phenotypic and molecular characterization of extended spectrum beta lactamase and AmpC beta lactamases in Escherichia coli from a tertiary care centre in India

Aishwarya Govindaswamy, Vijeta Bajpai, P. Batra, R. Malhotra, P. Mathur
{"title":"Phenotypic and molecular characterization of extended spectrum beta lactamase and AmpC beta lactamases in Escherichia coli from a tertiary care centre in India","authors":"Aishwarya Govindaswamy, Vijeta Bajpai, P. Batra, R. Malhotra, P. Mathur","doi":"10.4103/JPSIC.JPSIC_11_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotic resistance mediated by extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC enzymes in Escherichia coli continue to be a major threat in a health care setting. This study was undertaken to calculate the prevalence and to characterize ESBL and AmpC enzymes produced by E. coli by various phenotypic and molecular methods (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]). Materials and Methods: A total of 196 clinical isolates of E. coli were screened for ESBL production using cephalosporin disk diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination by E-test and Vitek-2 system. Phenotypic confirmation for ESBL production was done using cephalosporin/clavulanate combination disc test method and E-test for ESBLs. For the detection of AmpC enzymes, cefoxitin disk diffusion and cefoxitin MIC testing was used and further phenotypically confirmed by three dimensional extract test, AmpC disk test, boronic acid disk test method and disk approximation method. The genotypic detection of ESBL genes and AmpC genes were done by PCR. Statistical Analysis: The data was analyzed using SPSS software (Version 21.0). Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis of the data. Results: The prevalence of ESBL and AmpC enzymes among E. coli isolates was found 93.12% and 28.68%. Among the various phenotypic screening methods evaluated, ceftazidime (CZD) disk diffusion test had the highest sensitivity of 90.67% and positive predict value of 92.86% followed by cefotaxime and CZD in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For AmpC β-lactamases, the cefoxitin disk used for screening of AmpC β-lactamases had sensitivity of 91.67%, specificity of 59.14%, positive predict value of 46.48%, and negative predict value of 94.83% when compared with PCR. Conclusion: The high prevalence of ESBL and AmpC in our study emphasises on the judicious use of antibiotics in controlling antimicrobial resistance in the hospital.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JPSIC.JPSIC_11_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance mediated by extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC enzymes in Escherichia coli continue to be a major threat in a health care setting. This study was undertaken to calculate the prevalence and to characterize ESBL and AmpC enzymes produced by E. coli by various phenotypic and molecular methods (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]). Materials and Methods: A total of 196 clinical isolates of E. coli were screened for ESBL production using cephalosporin disk diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination by E-test and Vitek-2 system. Phenotypic confirmation for ESBL production was done using cephalosporin/clavulanate combination disc test method and E-test for ESBLs. For the detection of AmpC enzymes, cefoxitin disk diffusion and cefoxitin MIC testing was used and further phenotypically confirmed by three dimensional extract test, AmpC disk test, boronic acid disk test method and disk approximation method. The genotypic detection of ESBL genes and AmpC genes were done by PCR. Statistical Analysis: The data was analyzed using SPSS software (Version 21.0). Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis of the data. Results: The prevalence of ESBL and AmpC enzymes among E. coli isolates was found 93.12% and 28.68%. Among the various phenotypic screening methods evaluated, ceftazidime (CZD) disk diffusion test had the highest sensitivity of 90.67% and positive predict value of 92.86% followed by cefotaxime and CZD in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For AmpC β-lactamases, the cefoxitin disk used for screening of AmpC β-lactamases had sensitivity of 91.67%, specificity of 59.14%, positive predict value of 46.48%, and negative predict value of 94.83% when compared with PCR. Conclusion: The high prevalence of ESBL and AmpC in our study emphasises on the judicious use of antibiotics in controlling antimicrobial resistance in the hospital.
来自印度三级保健中心的大肠杆菌中广谱β -内酰胺酶和AmpC β -内酰胺酶的表型和分子特征
背景:大肠杆菌中扩展谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)和AmpC酶介导的抗生素耐药性仍然是卫生保健环境中的主要威胁。本研究旨在通过各种表型和分子方法(聚合酶链反应[PCR])计算大肠杆菌产生的ESBL和AmpC酶的患病率并对其进行表征。材料与方法:采用头孢菌素盘片扩散法、E-test法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、Vitek-2系统对196株临床分离的大肠杆菌进行ESBL生产筛选。采用头孢菌素/克拉维酸联合圆盘试验法和ESBL的e -试验进行ESBL的表型确认。AmpC酶检测采用头孢西丁纸片扩散法和头孢西丁MIC法,并通过三维提取法、AmpC纸片法、硼酸纸片法和纸片近似法进一步进行表型证实。采用PCR法检测ESBL基因和AmpC基因的基因型。统计分析:采用SPSS软件(Version 21.0)对数据进行分析。采用卡方检验对资料进行统计分析。结果:大肠杆菌分离株中ESBL和AmpC酶的检出率分别为93.12%和28.68%。与聚合酶链反应(PCR)法比较,头孢他啶(CZD)圆盘扩散试验的敏感性最高,为90.67%,阳性预测值为92.86%,其次为头孢他啶和CZD。对于AmpC β-内酰胺酶,头孢西丁圆盘法筛选AmpC β-内酰胺酶与PCR相比敏感性为91.67%,特异性为59.14%,阳性预测值为46.48%,阴性预测值为94.83%。结论:本院ESBL和AmpC的高发,强调合理使用抗生素是控制院内抗菌药物耐药的重要手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信