Exploring the relationship between two compositions using canonical correlation analysis

G. Mateu-Figueras, J. Daunis-i-Estadella, G. Coenders, Berta Ferrer-Rosell, Ricard Serlavós, J. Batista-Foguet
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between two compositions using canonical correlation analysis","authors":"G. Mateu-Figueras, J. Daunis-i-Estadella, G. Coenders, Berta Ferrer-Rosell, Ricard Serlavós, J. Batista-Foguet","doi":"10.51936/epet8264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to describe a method for relating two compositions which combines compositional data analysis and canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and to examine its main statistical properties. We use additive log-ratio (alr) transformation on both compositions and apply standard CCA to the transformed data. We show that canonical variates are themselves log-ratios and log-contrasts. The first pair of canonical variates can be interpreted as the log-contrast of a composition that has the maximum correlation with a log-contrast of the other composition. The second pair can be interpreted as the log-contrast of a composition that has the maximum correlation with a log-contrast of the other composition, under the restriction that they are uncorrelated with the first pair, and so on. Using properties from changes of basis, we prove that both canonical correlations and canonical variates are invariant to the choice of divisors in alr transformation. We show how to implement the analysis and interpret the results by means of an illustration from the social sciences field using data from Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and Boyatzis' Philosophical Orientation Questionnaire, which distribute a fixed total score among several learning modes and philosophical orientations.","PeriodicalId":242585,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","volume":"209 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/epet8264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe a method for relating two compositions which combines compositional data analysis and canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and to examine its main statistical properties. We use additive log-ratio (alr) transformation on both compositions and apply standard CCA to the transformed data. We show that canonical variates are themselves log-ratios and log-contrasts. The first pair of canonical variates can be interpreted as the log-contrast of a composition that has the maximum correlation with a log-contrast of the other composition. The second pair can be interpreted as the log-contrast of a composition that has the maximum correlation with a log-contrast of the other composition, under the restriction that they are uncorrelated with the first pair, and so on. Using properties from changes of basis, we prove that both canonical correlations and canonical variates are invariant to the choice of divisors in alr transformation. We show how to implement the analysis and interpret the results by means of an illustration from the social sciences field using data from Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and Boyatzis' Philosophical Orientation Questionnaire, which distribute a fixed total score among several learning modes and philosophical orientations.
利用典型相关分析探索两个成分之间的关系
本文的目的是描述一种结合组合数据分析和典型相关分析(CCA)的两种组合的关联方法,并检查其主要统计特性。我们对这两种组合使用加性对数比(alr)变换,并对转换后的数据应用标准的CCA。我们证明了典型变量本身就是对数比和对数对比。第一对典型变量可以被解释为与另一个组合的对数对比具有最大相关性的组合的对数对比。在与第一对不相关的限制下,第二对可以被解释为与另一个组合的对数对比具有最大相关性的组合的对数对比,依此类推。利用基变换的性质,证明了正则相关和正则变量对任意变换中除数的选择是不变的。本文以社会科学领域为例,利用Kolb的学习风格量表和Boyatzis的哲学取向问卷的数据,展示了如何实施分析和解释结果,这两个问卷在几种学习模式和哲学取向之间分配了固定的总分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信