The Typology of Poetic Text Comprehension

Inna Nohachevska, L. Komarnitska
{"title":"The Typology of Poetic Text Comprehension","authors":"Inna Nohachevska, L. Komarnitska","doi":"10.32626/2227-6246.2023-60.162-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is to assess the relevance of the research of psychological features of understanding contemporary poetry by future philolo-gists on the basis of questionnaires; to propose the levels of understanding the text.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the re-search were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical me­thod, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systemati-zation, modeling, generalization. The method of organizing empirical research was used as the experimental method.the results of the research. Future philologists of all courses show a signifi-cant level of interest (50% – 55%) according to the poetry of Ukrainian authors, prose writers through watching TV shows and reading periodicals. In the condi-tions of contemporary higher education the ability of students to acquire know­ledge independently in the connection with the introduction of the competence approach provided in education plays a special role. We proved, that 66%–70% of respondents had tried to comprehend a poetry of their own form and the form having been explicated their own impression of what they had already read; 31% of students of the 1st and the 2nd courses and 28.6% of students of the 3rd and the 4th courses had had a high level of the interpretation of the teacher’s activity. Thus, a great number of students have the awareness of the need to indepen-dently form the opinion about what they have read.conclusions. In the typology of text comprehension we have found four levels. Each previous level is an indispensable condition for the existence of the next one. At the first level only the substantive content of the text is conveyed, which does not provide the necessary understanding of it. The second level of un-derstanding is commentary one. Understanding the text at this level means not only being able to retell the first text with other language units, but also to com-ment it from the point of view of the context. The third level of understanding is the interpretation of the text (philosophical, historical­literary, psychological, etc.). This task is to master deep meanings. The fourth level of understanding is a methodological one, where the contradictions that are arisen at the previous level are resolved","PeriodicalId":250456,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-60.162-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to assess the relevance of the research of psychological features of understanding contemporary poetry by future philolo-gists on the basis of questionnaires; to propose the levels of understanding the text.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the re-search were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical me­thod, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systemati-zation, modeling, generalization. The method of organizing empirical research was used as the experimental method.the results of the research. Future philologists of all courses show a signifi-cant level of interest (50% – 55%) according to the poetry of Ukrainian authors, prose writers through watching TV shows and reading periodicals. In the condi-tions of contemporary higher education the ability of students to acquire know­ledge independently in the connection with the introduction of the competence approach provided in education plays a special role. We proved, that 66%–70% of respondents had tried to comprehend a poetry of their own form and the form having been explicated their own impression of what they had already read; 31% of students of the 1st and the 2nd courses and 28.6% of students of the 3rd and the 4th courses had had a high level of the interpretation of the teacher’s activity. Thus, a great number of students have the awareness of the need to indepen-dently form the opinion about what they have read.conclusions. In the typology of text comprehension we have found four levels. Each previous level is an indispensable condition for the existence of the next one. At the first level only the substantive content of the text is conveyed, which does not provide the necessary understanding of it. The second level of un-derstanding is commentary one. Understanding the text at this level means not only being able to retell the first text with other language units, but also to com-ment it from the point of view of the context. The third level of understanding is the interpretation of the text (philosophical, historical­literary, psychological, etc.). This task is to master deep meanings. The fourth level of understanding is a methodological one, where the contradictions that are arisen at the previous level are resolved
诗歌文本理解的类型学
本研究的目的是在问卷调查的基础上,评估未来语言学家对当代诗歌理解心理特征研究的相关性;提出理解课文的层次。研究方法。本文采用了分类方法、结构与功能方法、分析方法、系统化方法、建模方法、泛化方法等理论方法来解决本文提出的研究任务。实验方法采用组织实证研究的方法。研究的结果。所有课程的未来语言学家通过观看电视节目和阅读期刊,根据乌克兰作家的诗歌,散文作家的诗歌显示出显着的兴趣水平(50% - 55%)。在当代高等教育条件下,学生自主获取知识的能力在素质教育的引入中具有特殊的作用。我们证明,66%-70%的受访者曾试图理解他们自己形式的诗歌,并且形式已经被解释为他们自己对已经读过的东西的印象;31%的1、2门课学生和28.6%的3、4门课学生对教师活动的解读水平较高。因此,许多学生已经意识到需要对他们所读的内容独立形成意见。在文本理解的类型学中,我们发现了四个层次。前一关是下一关存在的必要条件。第一层次只传达文本的实质性内容,没有提供对文本的必要理解。第二层次的理解是评注。在这个层次上理解文本意味着不仅能够用其他语言单位复述第一篇文本,而且能够从上下文的角度对其进行评论。理解的第三个层次是对文本的解释(哲学的、历史文学的、心理的等)。这项任务是掌握深层含义。认识的第四个层次是方法论的层次,在这个层次上,前一个层次上产生的矛盾得到解决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信