Monte Carlo evidence for need of improved percolation model for non-weibullian degradation in high-κ dielectrics

N. Raghavan, K. Shubhakar, K. Pey
{"title":"Monte Carlo evidence for need of improved percolation model for non-weibullian degradation in high-κ dielectrics","authors":"N. Raghavan, K. Shubhakar, K. Pey","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dielectric breakdown is one of the critical failure mechanisms and showstopper for ultra-large scale integrated (ULSI) circuits as it impacts the performance and functioning of the transistor, which is the fundamental unit governing the operation of all the advanced microprocessors that we have today. As a reliability engineer, it is essential that the failure mode and mechanism be best described using statistical distributions that correlate with the physical mechanism and driving forces causing failure. In many cases, the distributions used to represent the time to failure data are empirically assumed, without carefully considering its implications on the extrapolated predictions of field lifetime. Application of a wrong distribution can give lifetime estimates that vary by many orders of magnitude, which nullify the very purpose of the reliability study in itself. The Weibull distribution is commonly used to describe random defect generation induced percolation failure of the oxide (dielectric) by means of the “weakest link” phenomenology [1, 2]. While the assumption of a Weibull distribution is well justified for silicon oxide (SiO2) and silicon oxynitride (SiON) materials [3, 4], the application of the same stochastics for high permittivity (high-κ) dielectrics is questionable [5] - [7]. This is fundamentally attributable to the different microstructure of the grown / deposited dielectrics, which we will discuss in detail, along with strong physical analysis evidence. We will present further evidence using Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations to explain the origin of the non-Weibullian trends observed. The key motivation of this study is to caution microelectronics reliability scientists against the use of standard statistical distributions for all scenarios. We may have to resort to the need for non-standard distributions or selectively use the standard distributions only over confined percentile ranges, as material and device failure mechanisms become increasingly complex and interdependent in nanoscale integrated circuits.","PeriodicalId":189714,"journal":{"name":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Dielectric breakdown is one of the critical failure mechanisms and showstopper for ultra-large scale integrated (ULSI) circuits as it impacts the performance and functioning of the transistor, which is the fundamental unit governing the operation of all the advanced microprocessors that we have today. As a reliability engineer, it is essential that the failure mode and mechanism be best described using statistical distributions that correlate with the physical mechanism and driving forces causing failure. In many cases, the distributions used to represent the time to failure data are empirically assumed, without carefully considering its implications on the extrapolated predictions of field lifetime. Application of a wrong distribution can give lifetime estimates that vary by many orders of magnitude, which nullify the very purpose of the reliability study in itself. The Weibull distribution is commonly used to describe random defect generation induced percolation failure of the oxide (dielectric) by means of the “weakest link” phenomenology [1, 2]. While the assumption of a Weibull distribution is well justified for silicon oxide (SiO2) and silicon oxynitride (SiON) materials [3, 4], the application of the same stochastics for high permittivity (high-κ) dielectrics is questionable [5] - [7]. This is fundamentally attributable to the different microstructure of the grown / deposited dielectrics, which we will discuss in detail, along with strong physical analysis evidence. We will present further evidence using Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations to explain the origin of the non-Weibullian trends observed. The key motivation of this study is to caution microelectronics reliability scientists against the use of standard statistical distributions for all scenarios. We may have to resort to the need for non-standard distributions or selectively use the standard distributions only over confined percentile ranges, as material and device failure mechanisms become increasingly complex and interdependent in nanoscale integrated circuits.
蒙特卡罗证据需要改进的渗透模型的非威布尔降解在高κ电介质
介质击穿是超大规模集成电路(ULSI)的关键失效机制之一,因为它会影响晶体管的性能和功能,而晶体管是当今所有先进微处理器运行的基本单元。作为一名可靠性工程师,使用与导致故障的物理机制和驱动力相关的统计分布来最好地描述故障模式和机制是至关重要的。在许多情况下,用于表示失效时间数据的分布是经验假设的,而没有仔细考虑其对油田寿命外推预测的影响。应用错误的分布可能会使寿命估计值发生许多数量级的变化,从而使可靠性研究本身的目的失效。威布尔分布常用“最薄弱环节”现象学来描述氧化物(电介质)的随机缺陷产生引起的渗透失效[1,2]。虽然威布尔分布的假设对于氧化硅(SiO2)和氧化氮化硅(SiON)材料来说是合理的[3,4],但对于高介电常数(高κ)电介质来说,同样的随机性的应用是值得怀疑的[5]-[7]。这从根本上归因于生长/沉积介质的不同微观结构,我们将详细讨论,以及强有力的物理分析证据。我们将使用动力学蒙特卡罗(KMC)模拟提供进一步的证据来解释所观察到的非威布尔趋势的起源。这项研究的主要动机是提醒微电子可靠性科学家不要在所有情况下使用标准统计分布。随着纳米级集成电路中材料和器件失效机制变得越来越复杂和相互依赖,我们可能不得不求助于非标准分布的需求,或者有选择地在有限的百分位数范围内使用标准分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信